EA_Spouse Forum Becoming Thriving Community 65
An anonymous reader writes "Kotaku has a story about the EA_Spouse Live Journal, which has become its own community of sorts, fostering endless rumors and gossip about EA culture. The site has more than 3,500 replies to the original diatribe post and grows daily. The latest finds include a link to an NPR story on the whole EA fiasco (the NPR reporter trolled the board for interviews) and copies of the contracts for Senior Vice President of Human Resources Rusty Rueff and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial & Administration Officer Warren Jenson. When is a T-shirt coming out?"
NPR Link (Score:5, Informative)
Re:NPR Link (Score:1)
T-Shirt (Score:3, Funny)
Re:T-Shirt (Score:4, Funny)
Re:T-Shirt (Score:2, Funny)
his job is lame
(hoping someone remembers the old EA Sports catchphrase)
Re:T-Shirt (Score:5, Funny)
Challenge EVERYTHING.
(Yeah, I remember the old commercials. The first few back in '95 actually got me excited about sports games again.)
Re:T-Shirt (Score:2)
Working on a physics engine would be a lot more fun and they probably wouldn't try to kill you.
Re:T-Shirt (Score:2)
http://www.cafepress.com/eaemployee
Leaked memo should kill this, right? (Score:1)
Re:Leaked memo should kill this, right? (Score:2)
basically the memo was a 'stopgap' put out by the management to try and stop the obvious discontent that comes with having the entire world laugh at your company...let alone the internal discontent that the EA drones themselves must be feeling - those that are smart enough to care...
In other words, EA management are 'considering' changing the rules...which you can read to mean that they are waiting
Re:Leaked memo should kill this, right? (Score:1)
The "leaked" memo was just HR placating the masses. I don't remember the exact wording of it (as I don't speak HRese) but it amount to "we will be reevaluating our policies and will be considering reclassifying some of our workers." Which probably translates to "some of you will be fired. And Probst gets a raise."
Also included in there was allusion that EA felt that the laws regarding overtime were 'outdated' and 'evil' and holding back their wonderful creative teams, but since
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:1)
Moderation rules: if( today == today && currentPost.getPosterName().equals("DerWulf")){
currentPost.mod(-1);
}
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:2)
But that, still doesn't excuse how much of an ass you are. It's not just her that's complaining, there are several other people who are coming out named, and talking about how awful this company is.
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:1)
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:3)
The people there have pointed out how EA is driving for a younger, more naive work force that they can suck the life out of for 2-5 years then jettison, like a disposable booster rocket. These aren't positions of prestige in any way, shape or
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:1)
I never bought the whole 'suck the life from the young'uns' line. Thing is, whatever job you take when you start your professional career you have to make up for your laking experience. This is often done through long hours or less money. Well, the market pays for experience. That is certainly not a big suprise. And, unless EA enters the business of selling human flesh, there is no way that they take something out of the
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:2)
Lawyers are also generally shady people, and like doctors, realize they can get any piece of arm candy they want, and their wives are golddiggers. So there's no love there. The wife doesn't give a crap whether advocate comes home on time...so long as he buys her a car.
Also, the market doesn'
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:1)
Also, about the 'provoke a response' thing. How is that bad? I can't think of a single statement, oral or written in the history of mankind that wasn't tailored to 'provoke a response'.
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:2)
It's not that your opinion itself wasn't "Slashdot-appropriate." Plenty of people have taken the position that EA employees are paid according to supply and demand. Plenty of people have said that they should switch jobs if they don't like their current employment. But they're not getting modded down.
Your post was modded down because...
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:2)
After ignoring those things which are simple restatements of earlier claims and gratuitous insults, there are only two things in your response that even remotely warrant a rebuttal.
First, the claim that I'm the one who doesn't understand what sexism is. What part of "punch her in the face", or "Don't you get it? You scare your husband away, you whiney broom" was I supposed to interpret as gender neutral? You assumed that EA_spouse was a woman
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:1, Interesting)
Liberal mayors... hmmm. Anyway thanks for associating obnoxiousness and a lack of compassion with opposition to liberalism. The L word has been so demonized within the US over the last few years that it really needs people like you to strengthen it again.
To answer your question: a troll isn't a stupidly spelt and worded question. A troll is a, usually insincere, posting designed to attract emotional responses. You can certainly post something you fundament
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:1)
Re:Cry me a fucking river (Score:1)
EA has a Class action lawsuit (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.gamespot.com/news/2004/11/11/news_6112
Soon to run out of space (Score:3, Interesting)
Having not read the article... (Score:5, Funny)
Interview of Interest. (Score:4, Interesting)
The T-Shirt (Score:4, Funny)
Re:The T-Shirt (Score:1)
Is that grammatically correct? The wording doesn't even make sense...
It should read: "... and all I didn't even get is this lousy T-shirt."
or
"... and I didn't get even get this lousy T-shirt."
I can't believe anyone would actually wear the shirt as it is currently worded.
Re:The T-Shirt (Score:1)
Fixed.
Re:The T-Shirt (Score:1)
Trolling for news (Score:2)
I hope the AC means that the NPR reporter trawled the board for interviews.
I mean, I'm sure trolling it would work, but it doesn't quite seem to fit as responsible journalism...
Re:Trolling for news (Score:1)