Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Entertainment Games

News Corp and Eidos Slam Buyout Rumour 17

Blue Ray writes "Both News Corp and Eidos have openly rubbished claims the the Murdoch behemoth will soon be absorbing the British publisher, corroborating a snippet in the Guardian's market forces column. In an article on SPOnG.com, News Corp stated "we've never held any kind of talks with Eidos", while an Eidos executive told the website "We read this and were astounded. We had no contact from the journalist who wrote the story and we are still laughing about what we read.""
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

News Corp and Eidos Slam Buyout Rumour

Comments Filter:
  • Conflict of interest (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward

    Spong have had it in for GI.biz for ages (this 'report' apparently 'debunks' a GI.biz story, and actively attacks them). I wonder why this is? Perhaps it is because Spong's parent company, Eleventeenth [eleventeenth.com] have a rather cosy relationship [eleventeenth.com] with MCV [mcvuk.com], who are in direct competition with GI.biz in news reporting, advertising and job advertising.

    Spong's headlines even appear on the MCV homepage, and they are hosted on the same IP.

    Not that this matters much, Spong have limited credability anyhow. Expect one of thie

    • Given the fact that GI have now 'debunked' the story themselves, what are you prattling on about?

      So MCV is hosted at the same IP as SPOnG and they have a news feed from SPOnG. What's wrong with that?

      Since MCV is a trade print magazine and GI is a website, how are they competing for news?
  • I see journalists use it in headlines (especially concerning politics and law and business) all the time, and it can mean anything from "insult" and "discredit" to (in this case) "LMAO." Do a Google search for slams -brakes -door -tennis -poetry (adding "slam" returns too many non-relevant results) and you'll see what I mean.

    It's such a sensationalist word and, frankly, I have become quite annoyed at the frequency with which I see it.
  • Just for the record, the original, wrong, story appeard on GamesIndustry.biz first and was copied across the Internet by other websites who are impressed by GI's URL. GI has NO association with any gaming industry institutions what so ever. GI is mostly one bloke in his room re-writing press releases.

    I still don't know why /. posts so many of GI's stories in the games section, they'd be better off tracking down the original press release.

Know Thy User.

Working...