Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Games Entertainment

Clover Vets Open SEEDS, Capcom Clears The Air 27

Posted by Zonk from the planting-the-stuff-to-grow-a-new-company dept.
Last week, the designers who used to head Capcom's Clover Studios (makers of Viewtiful Joe, Okami, and God Hand) announced that they were forming a new studio named SEEDS. Clover principles Atsushi Inaba, Hideki Kamiya, and Shinji Mikami are looking to make some 'preposterously amazing' games. People upset by Clover's closing, though, should know that most of the studio is back inside Capcom. In a Gamasutra article with Capcom Vice President of Marketing Charles Bellfield, he makes it a point to say: "Capcom, unlike most other developers, doesn't have dedicated strict boundaries between each of its development teams. We actually have one pool of development talent at Capcom and those individuals are basically assigned based on the timescales of each product we're working on ... the rest of the Clover team was just incorporated back into the rest of Capcom's development talent pool. So in fact, while three individuals left, Clover Studios as a separate entity was merged back into the rest of the Capcom teams and today, still, the talent we had, with the exception of three people, is still remaining at Capcom."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Clover Vets Open SEEDS, Capcom Clears The Air More

Clover Vets Open SEEDS, Capcom Clears The Air

Comments Filter:

  • Should horticulturalists not open seeds? (Score:3, Funny)

    by Timesprout ( 579035 ) on Tuesday February 20, 2007 @10:51AM (#18082166)
    And let the vets get on with neutering pets?
  • Don't we have enough damn seed based names? Not to mention this is way too close to Gundam SEED to be ignored.

  • Doesn't let Capcom off the hook (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Matchstick ( 94940 ) on Tuesday February 20, 2007 @11:40AM (#18082804)
    It's shortsighted to view a successful team as solely a collection of "human resources" to be broken up and spread around among projects. Smoothly functioning teams don't appear by magic when you throw a bunch of resources together; it takes time, and sometimes they don't appear at all.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Taulin ( 569009 )
      But that is how most Japanese companies work. When you interview for a job, you don't interview for a position, but rather for the company. In every major company (Canon, Fuji, Nissan, etc), this holds true, and you may be an accountant one year, and doing programming the next.
      • Regardless, the criticism holds.

        You can argue that breaking up Clover was not bad, as many of its recent games were not received as well as they might have been. However, there is room to be skeptical about the practice in general.

        The perception is, and is sometimes true, that teams with great synergy are broken up and divided amongst other groups by the callous processes of HR. Whether or not this is standard practice is not the issue, whether or not this is good practice is.

        There's nothing wrong with the

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by Taulin ( 569009 )
          I totally agree. I only tell people about this just to see the culture shock they go through. Even at my 'day job' we are working with a major Japanese client, and they found our non-component approach interesting. The people they sent over here to work with us were never part of the components they came over to support. Totally ridiculous. Between this, and having worked over there several years doing contract work, it amazes me that they are able to make what they do. They are good, smart people, an
        • It's not just Japanese companies that miss the big picture regarding group dynamics.

          At a multi-studio game company I worked for a few years ago, I was part of a successful new studio that got broken up in part because they wanted to redistribute our personnel. Ironically, we ended up being victims of our own success. The management got it into their head that they could improve the overall quality of the other studios by breaking up our groups and redistributing it throughout the company.

          Still, it wasn't
  • I played a great Capcom game last night...Ghost and Goblins for the NES8 on an emulator. I remember when these guys were like the #2 or #3 game provider for the NES8 in the 1980s - anyone know how are they doing today?
    • All I know is that after Mega Man X, I stopped playing Mega Man games. X was awesome, but something about the sequels lost me. Legends was interesting but ultimately came down to endlessly strafing every boss and enemy in the game. I honestly can't say anything about the handheld games.

      Call me old fashioned, but I really just want an old style Mega Man game with 8 Robot masters.
    • How about Bionic Commando? I don't own a Wii, and currently have no plans to, but if there were to be a Bionic Commando game on the Wii... good lord, the sheer awesomeness would be astounding.

  • Clover principles Atsushi Inaba, Hideki Kamiya, and Shinji Mikami

    Clover principals. This is one of the trickier homonyms in the English language because their meanings are so very similar. Principle can mean primary so it does seem like it makes sense to use it here. However, principal is the word we're looking for here: "a chief or head."[1]

    Slashdot: Where the users suggest the stories, and are the only ones doing any editing...

    [1] "principal." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 20

    • I heard the Atsushi Inaba principle is a corner stone of capcom development.

    • it's an adjective phrase... (Score:1, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward
      It's also common in English to shorten an adjective phrase to contain only its adjective, at least in informal use. This is especially true for a common or well-understood adjective phrase such as "principle players" or "principle members".

      You are correct to state that "principal" and "principle" are difficult homonyms, but you have misidentified this particular situation as an example of homonym substitution. More likely the writer was merely truncating the adjective phrase.
  • I believe there is magic in a good team: synergy. This means that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.

    I regularly see examples of small teams of 5 people outperforming the 40-person team (of course, communication overhead grows very quickly).

    Anyhow, with that in mind, Capcom's declaration does not reassure me at all. You can't just "assign" someone to a project and expect to see that project get the same boost as the assignee's previous.

    They've kept most of the people, but they've very probably d

Slashdot Top Deals

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Close