Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Role Playing (Games) Entertainment Games

Explaining the Dearth of Console MMOGs 123

Posted by timothy from the because-nerdvana-has-pc-labs-installed dept.
spielermacher writes "Gamasutra is running an interesting analysis written by Flying Lab Software Producer Joe Ludwig explaining why there are not more successful Console MMOGs. Some reasons given: lack of keyboard, MMOG players like to play in pairs, business model doesn't always work out for the developer, larger installed base of game-quality PCs, and others."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Explaining the Dearth of Console MMOGs More

Explaining the Dearth of Console MMOGs

Comments Filter:

  • How About The Dearth of Comment? (Score:3, Funny)

    by Jeremiah Cornelius ( 137 ) * on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @01:41PM (#23731563) Homepage Journal
    I, for one, lament the dearth of teletype MMOGs, let alone those that can be navigated from my console. Count me in the minority...
    • MMOGs?

    • MUDs (Score:2, Insightful)

      by tepples ( 727027 )

      I, for one, lament the dearth of teletype MMOGs, let alone those that can be navigated from my console.
      What dearth? There are plenty of MUDs [wikipedia.org].
      • Long live MUDs. All of the Dikus and Mercs, SMAUGs and ROMs(not so much ROMs), MUCKs and MOOs, and all other immensely geeky media.
    • I object to your characterization you insensitive clod!

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by SeePage87 ( 923251 )
      Oh, to be back in the days of ASCII TradeWars played on the BBSes with a 4800 baud modem. Now I have to play http://www.starportgame.com/ [starportgame.com]Starport: Galactic Empires on broadband. What's this world coming to?

    • Re:How About The Dearth of Comment? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Eudial ( 590661 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @02:45PM (#23733347)
      Welcome to Slashdot MUD

      >-|-OD+

      Login: Eudial
      Password: *********

      Welcome!

      > look
      You see various posts, modded funny, insightful and troll.
      > examine fp
      You see the First Post. It is modded 5, Funny.
      > look in fp
      It's dark. You see nothing.
      > equip torch
      Ok.
      > look in fp
      It wasn't that funny. Just got the attention of all moderators since it was first. Poster has a low UID.
      > attack fp.
      You try to stab the fp, but miss.
      The fp stabs you in the face.
      You die. The post was funnier than you thought.
      R.I.P.

      Connection reset by server.


      Hmmm... could work.
      • You would have been eaten by a fr0st p1st long before you whipped out your torch.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by Eudial ( 590661 )

          You would have been eaten by a fr0st p1st long before you whipped out your torch.
          Fortunately, the dire fr0st p1st that used to prowl the MUD dropped it's torch and was eaten by a grue.

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Macgrrl ( 762836 )

        It's dark. You see nothing.

        You are eaten by a Grue.

  • Consoles don't have keyboards so it must be a pain the a** to login let alone set up your account.

    JACEM
    • Ha! I have mastered posting to Slashdot with an Apple Remote! [wikipedia.org]

      I can do anything!

    • Re:No Keyboard (Score:4, Informative)

      by oahazmatt ( 868057 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @01:56PM (#23731965) Journal
      Actually, the Logitech ProBoard was sold for about $20 and was fully compliant for the PS2 and Final Fantasy XI. I've recently discovered it works on both the X-Box 360 and the Wii.

      • Re:No Keyboard (Score:4, Insightful)

        by stormguard2099 ( 1177733 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @04:29PM (#23736179)
        That doesn't really matter. computers ALL have keyboards, it's a given. As long as you have to buy the keyboard extra for the console the PC will always have that advantage to it. you can't design a MMO around keyboard usage on the console and expect it to do anything but flounder and as long as you only have a controller then it will continue to be inadequate.

        • That doesn't really matter. computers ALL have keyboards, it's a given. As long as you have to buy the keyboard extra for the console the PC will always have that advantage to it. you can't design a MMO around keyboard usage on the console and expect it to do anything but flounder and as long as you only have a controller then it will continue to be inadequate.

          But video game systems have always been itemized, with the exception of the early Nintendo system. You will not get everything you need for games you may not buy in one package. USB keyboards are available for the option of expansion.

          It's not unfair to request that the publisher of the MMO provide a USB Keyboard (a small one, such as the ProBoard mentioned previously) in the packaging. If Rockstar can package a safe-deposit box in GTA then a compacted keyboard can be included in FFXI or a WoW port.

          Wh

          • Here's my simple and sweet answer. If my computer already had a wiimote, wiiwheel and a wiifit i wouldn't buy a wii.

            • Here's my simple and sweet answer. If my computer already had a wiimote, wiiwheel and a wiifit i wouldn't buy a wii.

              But your computer doesn't need any of those add-ons. Going back to your previous point, what your computer does need is a keyboard for input. This is why computers (those commercially sold as a complete system) include a keyboard. It is necessary to the PC operation prior to the OS loading.

              That is why the keyboard comes with the PC, and not the OS. This is also why a keyboard is not packaged with a game console. The interface is not intended for regular input from a keyboard, therefore it is unnecessary

              • I'm not saying that computers should be sold with all of the add-ons for the wii nor am I saying that consoles should be sold with keyboards.

                I am saying that as long as people already have keyboards for their computers they will tend to play more games that are best played with keyboards on their computers.

                What I meant about the wii controllers and the pcs is that if the pc already had all of those controllers standard I would just play the pc instead of investing more money in add-ons that i already have e
        • Console gamers are not stupid. If a game works best with a dedicated controller, they will buy them. Like all those Playstation 1 gamers who bought Dual Shocks in 1998, or the PS2 gamers who bought headsets in 2002, or all those EQOA and FFXI players who either bought keyboards or used one they already had.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by geekoid ( 135745 )
          Yes, no one would go out and spend 5 bucks on a USB keyboard for their console~

          I plugged a keyboard into my Wii and it work flawlessly.
          Easy, Peasy.

          The name of Nintendo newest console sure makes for some interesting sentences.

          I love my Wii.

    • Re:No Keyboard (Score:5, Insightful)

      by fitten ( 521191 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @01:57PM (#23732013)
      Because chatting via typing is difficult when you don't have a keyboard. The other option is to use voice communication and it's hard enough dealing with text chat much less several dozen people all talking at once... seriously, could you imagine Barrens chat if it were voice? or the chat inside Ironforge? How about all the gold/isk sellers spamming voice chat? Many people use most MMOs as a fancy graphical chatroom. When you can't chat... well, there you go.

      Voice works great for guilds/corps/groups/raids but that is selective admission into the channel(s) already.

      And then you get into needing lots of buttons for game play. You need how many for your spell icons in WoW? How about adding attack and all the other commands as well? (crafting/harvesting/etc).

      There just aren't enough buttons on a gamepad for them all, and if you did have them, it'd turn into a keyboard of some kind (maybe a chorded one).

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by joggle ( 594025 )
        I agree about the lack of buttons. It's really a shame too since it should be trivial to allow USB keyboards to work with the Xbox 360. You'd probably need a larger hard drive to support new game data as it becomes available though.

        I'd love to play something like LOTRO on a 360 if I had a keyboard. That way I could keep track of which of my friends are online playing other games and I could ask them to come over to help me or, for example, I could load up Halo 3 to play that with them a bit if I was just do

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by grumbel ( 592662 )

        And then you get into needing lots of buttons for game play.

        Todays controller do have tons of buttons, it really wouldn't be all that hard to map everything WoW has to offer on a controller, which after all only has 12 action buttons in its default GUI, while game controller have 14 action buttons. And that is not even considering that a console MMORPG could be build up from the ground for a controller and thus be made to work with that perfectly instead of trying to retrofit a PC game to the console controller, after all there are tons of console RPGs that work ju

      • Voice works great for guilds/corps/groups/raids but that is selective admission into the channel(s) already.

        Most people on MMOs never talk to anyone outside their guild/group anyway, so that's not exactly a problem.

        And then you get into needing lots of buttons for game play. You need how many for your spell icons in WoW? How about adding attack and all the other commands as well? (crafting/harvesting/etc).

        Who says that a console MMO needs icons for dozens of spells?

        Or for that matter, who says an MMO has to

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by tacroy ( 813477 )
      Both xbox and ps3 can use a keyboard, and the xbox has a "chatpad" which dock into the normal controller and works incredibly well. Also, the bulk of chat would most likely be audio, something consoles have working quite well.

    • Login is the least of your worries (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Moraelin ( 679338 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @02:19PM (#23732587) Journal
      Actually, having played a lot of MMOs, IMHO the login is the least of your worries.

      In WoW a Shaman can easily run out of the 60 icon slots on the toolbars. On COH most of my characters had to keep some of the temporary powers off the 3 toolbars available (only _very_ recently they provided the option to open more).

      You need _some_ way to activate them quickly. Be it keyboard or by clicking them with the mouse. Scrolling through lists of choices with a gamepad, in real time, would suck more ass than the vacuum toilets on the Soyuz ;)

      I mean, seriously, I can see the talks after a WoW-style raid:

      Tank: "Dude, FFS, why didn't you heal???"
      Priest: "Sorry, guys, I had to look for a mana potion in through my action list."
      Mage: "Heh. Do what I do, just scroll to it in advance."
      Priest: "STFU, noob. The only reason I wasn't at it, was that I looked for the bandages earlier when you over-nuked."

      The best I've seen done with a gamepad was Sega's PSO, which was little more than a hack-and-slash with 6 actions maximum, assigned to 3 keys on the gamepad. Plus one "shift" key to select between the first and second set.

      The sequel, PSU, reduced that even more. Yeah, so you can play it on a gamepad. Except with any given weapon you have exactly one special attack you can assign to a key. And you have to scroll through a list to even select your mana potion or put on some special glasses. (Which turn off your sword, since you don't have enough buttons to activate the glasses _and_ use the sword.) It gets (A) annoying fast, and (B) repetitive fast, since the number of actions is finite and small, and there are no clever combinations and strategies to use with them.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Dutch Gun ( 899105 )
        Not all MMOs require massive numbers of on-screen spells. Everquest provides 8 spell slots (if I remember correctly), and Guild Wars only allows 8 skill slots at a time as well. Part of the strategy in these games is choosing a subset of your available firepower that will work well for a particular mission or area. WoW is obviously optimized for a PC platform with a mouse and keyboard input. So, yeah, a straight port of WoW would probably be pretty awful. But it's certainly possible to design a compell
        • Not to mention you could use buttons as shifters. Hit the left shoulder pad and it changes your active spell slots to an alternate. Now you have 8 possible spells you can cast in a split second (on an standard PS/XB controller.) Use both shoulders on both sides and you have the possibility of 16. Use them in combination (topleft + topright + x) and you come up with 40 buttons and I haven't even touched the direction pads.

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by hansamurai ( 907719 )
        Speaking of Phantasy Star Online and keyboards, you could actually get a Gamecube controller with a keyboard in the middle. My friend had one and it was one of the funniest things I ever held. He used it for PSO, which he played all the time.

        http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/media/2389/1/9342.jpg [nintendoworldreport.com]

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Kelbear ( 870538 )
        In Saints Row, all weapons were selected with one button+stick movement. Pressing B brings up a wheel(radial dial) displaying all the available weapons(12 I believe?), and you flick the stick in the direction of the weapon you wanted. Let go of the button and the weapon is selected.

        You can use several buttons in this manner for quick selection of a large number of items/abilities since this would eliminate the need for scrolling. There may be some need for accuracy and practice, but very minimal relative to
      • Which brings up another interesting issue - customization. With WoW, you can have 60-odd buttons placed to your liking thanks to various add-ons - the game has a very rich scripting interface for that sort of thing. Console makers are not historically fond of scripting interfaces, lest the script writer find their way into parts of the system they shouldn't have access to.

        A second issue is that every time I hear a console dev is going to make an MMO, they're going to make it "console-friendly"; the result
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by kellyb9 ( 954229 )
      If the lack of a keyboard was seriously the only thing stopping console video game companies from making millions upon millions of dollars, I'm pretty sure they would have released one. I mean, they have the technology, it really isn't that complicated.

    • Consoles don't have keyboards so it must be a pain the a** to login let alone set up your account.

      Setting up, say, an XBox Live account (name, address, card details...) with a controller is annoying, but you only do that once. Entering a password is a mild annoyance, but that's pretty much irrelevant for most people because the consoles have the whole "logging in" thing down pretty well. You don't need to re-enter all your details to register for every game. I can set a password on my PS3, but I have no

  • Some reasons given: (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Fozzyuw ( 950608 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @01:42PM (#23731585)

    Some reasons given

    Or the most obvious answer... parents don't want their TV tied up for 16 hours at a time while their 26 year old son "Johnny" does back to back raids. =P

    Another argument about his lack of job hunting skills and the small TV in the bedroom doesn't cut it. =D

    • I dunno about you but most people have TV's in there bedroom.

      In some cases houses only have one TV, but they also only have one computer.

      Think about it.
      • According to Nielsen, the bedroom TV is for Pr0n. Games stay in the family-room, thankyouverymuch.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by SQLGuru ( 980662 )
          XBox 360 on the front TV.
          Original XBox in the bedroom.
          Laptop whereever it's needed.
          Desktop in the computer room.

          And pr0n is portable......it'll play on any of the above devices.....

          Layne

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by geekoid ( 135745 )
          I suspect that is changing. More kids have TVs in their bedrooms, why wouldn't they have games as well as porn?

      • Re: (Score:1)

        by tepples ( 727027 )

        In some cases houses only have one TV, but they also only have one computer.
        On a video game console, one TV serves up to four people. On a PC, one monitor serves only one person because major PC game publishers don't feel that shared-screen multiplayer is worth anything.
  • ...but no one is willing to take the risk. I've been playing WoW with a xbox360 controller for years and I love it. :p Joy To Key is one of the best pieces of software ever developed... ( http://www.electracode.com/4/joy2key/JoyToKey%20English%20Version.htm [electracode.com] )

  • Erm, obvious? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Speare ( 84249 )
    • limited networking ability on the consoles
    • less multi-threading support in traditional console app architecture
    • product-oriented publishers not good at running service-oriented servers
    • what to do with little kids in big adult world
    • ...
    • profit!!! (which can't be determined until servers run for months)

    • Re:Erm, obvious? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by JebusIsLord ( 566856 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @02:48PM (#23733429)
      * The modern consoles ALL have built-in networking.
      * The modern consoles (Wii exempt) both have multiple CPU cores. Anyhow, a) why do MMOs need multi-threading more than traditional games, and b) why do you think the multithreading support is lacking in consoles?
      * The same developers who make MMOs for PCs (Sony, Square Enix), make non-MMO console games. These guys already know how to run the business end of it.
      * The console market is huge, so games can target the young, the mature, or everyone. There are also parental controls on all 3 modern consoles.

      Not to flame you, but I don't think any of your answers are "erm, obvious", or even "erm, likely". There is tons of online gaming on XBOX, just not massively multiplayer.

      My guesses:

      * No keyboard for socializing! The 360 has a headset. I'm not sure about the PS3. The Wii is screwed on this front.
      * Hard drive space is limited on the 360, and these games have HUGE update requirements.
      * XBOX Live users are accustomed to a single XBOX live charge for online pay, and might balk at additional per-game charges. Sony plugs their "free online play". These games make their money off recurring charges.

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Speare ( 84249 )
        • modern consoles all have networking, which either depend on wifi or need you to route yet more cable to your television area just for some of the games that you will use on your television
        • modern consoles have plenty of cpu, agreed, but
          • you definitely notice any lag if you can't write nonblocking network code
          • you need to actually use the threading cpu features to get the benefits
          • it's still not in keeping with many game developers to write multithreaded games
          • we can't limit ourselves to the huge megalith
        • [blockquote]which either depend on wifi or need you to route yet more cable to your television area just for some of the games that you will use on your television[/blockquote]

          What? Your cable modem isn't next to your TV? And even if you don't have ethernet right near your TV, WiFi is an obvious and easy solution.

          [blockquote]modern consoles have plenty of cpu, agreed, but

          - you definitely notice any lag if you can't write nonblocking network code
          - you need to actually use the threading cpu features to get t
        • All games written for the current gen machines (Wii tech is really last gen) use multiple cores and multiple games. Its now a requirement to use multiple threads. You can't ship a title without it these days, sorry. (And its really simple to write nonblocking net code anyways - you don't really need threads because you're typically 60ms behind what's in the net queue and what's being displayed. Polling is fine.)

          The 360 has a 120GB harddrive. Lots of room for content update there. Even on the smaller
      • The Wii actually is dual-core. Same CPU family as the other consoles' CPUs, too. But its satellites don't work.

      • Console specs (Score:3, Informative)

        by DrYak ( 748999 )

        * The modern consoles (Wii exempt) both have multiple CPU cores.

        Nope. The PS3 has a single PowerPC core. You're confusing it with the SPU (of which there are 7) which are specialized stream processing units.
        But the system runs on the PowerPC core.

        The XBox is the only to feature 3 main cores.

        * No keyboard for socializing! The 360 has a headset. I'm not sure about the PS3. The Wii is screwed on this front.

        All 3 consoles (and even previous generation consoles) feature USB port. All console can use USB keyboards. (Out of the box for Playstations and XBoxes ; the Wii needs a firmware update which is automatic as soon as the Wii has internet access).

        Previous generation consoles (DreamCa

        • Yeah yeah, SPU and all that. We were talking about threading, and the PS3 is very capable of threading due to its multiple _whatever_s.

          The 360 can't use a keyboard, although they do have the chatpad which works pretty well.

          I'm not sure I agree with that conclusion though; WOW has the already-small PC gamer market saturated, and yet new PC MMOs come out with some regularity (Vanguard, LOTRO, Conan etc). Wouldn't coming out on a console give them a LARGER, less monopolized player base?
      • Also, any game on the 360 or the Wii is required by the manufacturer to run and function normally on a console with no storage space. So downloaded content being a requirement (as it is for MMO patches) is simply not possible.

  • Half-wrong... (Score:3, Informative)

    by SanityInAnarchy ( 655584 ) <ninja@slaphack.com> on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @02:18PM (#23732553) Journal

    Voice chat is great for small groups. It even works pretty well for short messages from one player to another. It really doesn't work so well for chat groups of 100.
    Nothing really works well for chat groups of 100. Voice chat can be done on that scale, though -- you just have to setup channels properly.

    There are other reasons to want a keyboard -- keyboards have far more buttons than controllers, meaning more actions, and MMOs can be complex. And there's the registration, login, etc.

    People sit pretty far back from their televisions, and even HD displays really aren't very high-res compared to PC screens.
    People do sit pretty far back. But HD is 1920x1080. Raise your hand if you have a computer monitor that high. The biggest I have is 1600x1200, which is not widescreen, and is 153,600 pixels fewer than a 1080p screen.

    MMOs take four to five years to build. People keep trying to convince themselves that they can do it in three years, but they're wrong.
    So what? Good MMOs are continuously updated for five to ten years. No reason to think you couldn't port it to a different platform and give it a graphical update in that time.

    Many, many people play MMOs (and other games for that matter) in pairs. I've played 6 different MMOs with my wife. Lots of people play with their spouses, siblings, or kids.
    And many, many people play console games in pairs, trios, or quartets. We tolerated split-screen for Goldeneye on the N64, where each player might get, what, 180x140 worth of screen space? And now we're on HD displays.

    Console MMOs really need to support split-screen play on a single machine, which adds to the development complexity.
    And developing for a single platform, instead of the "PC platform" of whatever the fsck the user decided to buy, should reduce development complexity.

    There were some good points here, and I'll stick with my PC platform as long as I can -- on Linux -- but I don't see anything compelling.

    Here's one thing that does matter: MMOs are big, and getting bigger. Much of them must be download in patches. It's difficult to buy a computer with a hard drive less than 80 gigs these days. It's difficult to buy a console with a hard drive more than 60 gigs, unless something's changed.

    Oh, and consoles very likely won't allow mods. Many people live by their WoW UI mods, custom voice chat, etc.
    • Wow, there are a lot of good things in there, but overall I think you're wrong.

      People do sit pretty far back. But HD is 1920x1080. Raise your hand if you have a computer monitor that high. The biggest I have is 1600x1200, which is not widescreen, and is 153,600 pixels fewer than a 1080p screen.

      Great. I sit 2 feet from my monitor, most people don't sit within 6 feet of their TV. I can't imagine playing an MMO and being able to fit as much chat on my TV and still keep it anywhere near as readable as it is on my computer.

      So what? Good MMOs are continuously updated for five to ten years. No reason to think you couldn't port it to a different platform and give it a graphical update in that time.

      Port to another console? You just want them to wave their magical wand and suddenly the code works, they don't have to work on the timing and threading that's unique to each console, and they don't have

      • Great. I sit 2 feet from my monitor, most people don't sit within 6 feet of their TV.

        The article mentions that, and so do I. That's why I have the signature I do.

        Port to another console? You just want them to wave their magical wand and suddenly the code works, they don't have to work on the timing and threading that's unique to each console, and they don't have to turn it into a major project that takes years?

        Erm... Portable code doesn't require magic, and it doesn't always take additional years. It does require forethought, though.

        The years of work that go into an MMO are, what, content, server load balancing issues, content, client update management, content, less-laggy network play, and oh yeah, content. Maybe I'm completely out of my league here, but it doesn't seem like the client is such a huge problem -- more like that you'd p

    • People do sit pretty far back. But HD is 1920x1080.

      Or 1280x720, or 1280x1020, with chroma subsampling further reducing the effective resolution. But more to the point, as you say, "People do sit pretty far back." so you DO need bigger text to be legible regardless of the resolution.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by ajs ( 35943 )

      Voice chat is great for small groups. It even works pretty well for short messages from one player to another. It really doesn't work so well for chat groups of 100.

      Nothing really works well for chat groups of 100. Voice chat can be done on that scale, though -- you just have to setup channels properly.

      Actually, for 100, open text channels work fine. For 1000, they break down.

      the primary problem, IMHO, with MMOs on consoles is that it's a totally different play style. Children didn't get MMOs started, it was teens and young adults for the most part that created the phenomenon, going back as far as Ultima. Those people play consoles, but for the most part they play consoles as a social event, getting friends together and bashing on a few bad guys. MMOs require more time spent, and longer social interactio

      • What I would like to see is DS-like devices or even phones.... I'd just like to be able to do things like move my characters around and list things on the auction house in WoW. Man, that would be so huge.
        One of the disadvantages of having a ginormous virtual world all under the control of one corporate overlord.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Eponymous Bastard ( 1143615 )
      A couple of your points

      So what? Good MMOs are continuously updated for five to ten years. No reason to think you couldn't port it to a different platform and give it a graphical update in that time.

      But updating, say, from PS2 to PS3 is so far from trivial it's not even funny. Compare to going from XP to Vista, for example. For that expense you can port to Mac or Linux easily.

      No businessman is going to make a decision of starting a project that is going to have to be ported to a new platform before even releasing, when you can stick to the PC and keep your investments low.

      The only way I can think of convincing someone to do this is if you have advanced knowledge on the next cons

      • Seriously, consoles are nice and all, but the current hardware doesn't look like a match for MMOs.


        You did know that the two biggest console MMORPG's are both PS2 games? A console from the previous generation?

      • For that expense you can port to Mac or Linux easily.

        Done right from the beginning, you can port to Mac or Linux easily anyway.

        No businessman is going to make a decision of starting a project that is going to have to be ported to a new platform before even releasing

        Without sarcasm, I'm guessing businessmen aren't driving Duke Nukem Forever.

        Notice also: This exact thing happened to Halo. It was originally going to be PC/Mac/Linux -- Mac, at least, because Bungie had always done Mac stuff -- and became an Xbox exclusive.

        In GoldenEye, both players were in the same map. In an MMO there is a chance that they'll be in completely different areas

        Keep in mind, same map doesn't necessarily mean at all close to each other. Also, with a dynamically loaded game, "same map" doesn't necessarily mean anything.

        Likewise, barring cordless headphones, you'll be sharing sound too.

        Why bar cordless

    • People do sit pretty far back. But HD is 1920x1080. Raise your hand if you have a computer monitor that high

      Interesting story...

      My fiance's father, has a home theatre setup-- an analog projector throwing a 102" picture. He's also an avid/addicted WoW player. When he replaced his dinky old computer with a new one, I made sure he got a good enough video card, and hooked the computer up to the projector.

      It works out great for mpgs we want to watch, but not so much for Warcraft. It looks great, don't get

      • He needs glasses to read, but not to see things that are far away. The screen is far enough away that he doesn't need them-- but the keyboard isn't. He (still) hasn't learned to touch type-- 100% hunt'n'peck. So he'd have to put on his glasses, use the keyboard, take them off, look up, repeat. Top it off with him saying that the screen is too big, and that he can't see everything (health, map, avatar, enemy) all at once.

        Well the solution to the first problem is simple.

        Talk to your optometrist or optician an

      • He (still) hasn't learned to touch type-- 100% hunt'n'peck.

        I learned dvorak with gtypist. There's a few others free, and probably some commercial ones for roughly $20 or so.

        Top it off with him saying that the screen is too big, and that he can't see everything (health, map, avatar, enemy) all at once.

        I don't know if WoW has a windowed mode out of the box, but it shouldn't be too hard to pull off.

        Not that this was a bad solution:

        So he invested in a 22" widescreen monitor instead, and we have the computer dual-weilding the displays so that he can WoW on the monitor, and at other times we can watch a movie on the screen

        Nice.

        Worth mentioning: You can get monitors with HDMI inputs, or cheap HDMI->DVI adapters. For older systems, well, my monitor has an RCA input. So while I do think that the couch would work for most people, in situations like yours, you could always do the conv

        • I learned dvorak with gtypist. There's a few others free, and probably some commercial ones for roughly $20 or so.

          Oh, I hear you on that. I've been trying to get him to learn for years now. Maybe if I rigged the system so that he had to pass a level of Touch Type before WoW loaded, I'd get him to actually learn. =)

          I don't know if WoW has a windowed mode out of the box, but it shouldn't be too hard to pull off.

          Not sure, though it would seem counter-productive to use a projector if you're going to shrin

  • At their heart, MMORPGs are glorified chat rooms (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Phrogman ( 80473 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @02:30PM (#23732951)

    ...and its hard to chat with no keyboard.

    MMORPGs owe their origins to the world of MUSHes and MUDs, which were essentially chat interfaces oriented around playing a game as a common activity.

    Much of my time in any MMORPG is spent talking with my group, whether determining tactics for the next fight, discussing game issues and features, or just finding out how things are going in their lives. All of that requires a convenient means to communicate, and while some people use voice communications for much of this, most still use typed chat. A console is simply not chat-friendly in the same manner that any PC is. Voice chat is less useful in many cases because you are not provided with any visual tag as to who is speaking as you are with in game typed chat (and when the female elf you have been playing with turns out to have a deep male voice, its harder to associate the spoken voice with the character at least at first). Its fine when you *know* the people from regular contact or in real life, but when playing in a pickup group (PUG), thats not the case.

    Now if a console system were to integrate a decent keyboard with the game instead of various controllers then this might change, but consoles appeal to a different style of gameplay (one I fail to appreciate) and often a different type of player. While standard games may be steadily moving to the console format in many cases, MMORPGs will remain PC oriented until new technology arises (some new form of voice recognition chat that puts what you say on screen as speech balloons say, rather than hearing it as voice, or more than likely in addition to doing so) that makes playing them possible and convenient. Personally speaking I know I could never use the substandard control available from a controller more effectively than the control gained from keyboard+mouse, although I am trying to adapt to using a Nostromo in some games at the moment. Even then its not as effective for me.

    • ...and its hard to chat with no keyboard.

      Exactly, expecially because many people don't like voice chat, for example when they can't speak in their native language. In my case I can read English well and write a pretty understandable one (well, hopefully - you judge it) but sometimes I miss words on TV and things get worse when I have to speak and understand quickly lots of different people.

      Finally, even native speakers may find the tone of their voice inadequate or do not want to give away their age or gender by speaking. I heard stories abo

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Phrogman ( 80473 )

        Finally, even native speakers may find the tone of their voice inadequate or do not want to give away their age or gender by speaking. I heard stories about charismatic MMOGs team leaders that lost all their credibility when somebody discovered them to be 12 year old boys or so. Actually, this proves that the adult team members were some fools caring more about their pride than about the skills of the leader, but also that the pre-teen leader had good reasons to hide himself behind a textual chat.

        Ah good point, text-based chat also provides anonymity for people who want to preserve it. A lot of female players get hassled endlessly in many MMORPGs, primarily because no one can reach out and "instruct" them on why that is not appreciated. I know my wife got a lot of sexual harassment in DAOC for a while there (people moving their toons behind hers and simulating sex acts (using physical /emote commands) for instance as well as a lot of verbal abuse, requests for cyber etc). I can understand a strong

    • You sir, are clueless. Why? Because you haven't been paying attention. Why do you think the PS2 has USB ports? To allow different kinds of input for different games, thats why. People have been plugging USB keyboards into the PS2's since 2001! Any console gamer who buys an MMORPG "knows" that they are going to want to hook up a keyboard for in-game chat.

      It truly is a non-issue.
  • Even with voice chat you aren't going to produce a very social game (which is what MMOGs really are about) without a keyboard. A joystick and four buttons won't cut it...which is why I still consider a standard PC of any flavor to be far superior to any console they can come up with.

    • Even with voice chat you aren't going to produce a very social game (which is what MMOGs really are about) without a keyboard. A joystick and four buttons won't cut it...which is why I still consider a standard PC of any flavor to be far superior to any console they can come up with.
      I never understand this argument. I can plug a standard USB keyboard into my PS3 just fine. Heck there are even mini-bluetooth keyboards available.

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by geekoid ( 135745 )
        It's becasue the argument is lame.
        They are basically saying "People will drop 250+ dollars for a console, but not drop 5 bucks for a keyboard."

        A better argument is that many people don't want a keyboard in the living room.
        It makes it too much like a computer, and a lot of people just want the consoles to work for a few hours while the blow off some steam. They don't want to deal the the PC 'baggage' that they have to deal with at work.

  • New consoles are their own MMO (Score:3, Interesting)

    by analog_line ( 465182 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @02:53PM (#23733569)
    This brings up something I've been devoting a bit of thought to lately (and has played into my decision-making on whether or not to get an Xbox360). What if the online console ecosystem we're creating is really it's own MMO.

    From an interview on gamasutra [gamasutra.com] that was linked here a while back that this article pricked to life out of my memory:

    CN: Is that the converse of "The PC market is dead?"

    RK: Well, yeah. I'm one of the people who went out there and said, "Single-player gaming is doomed," and I actually used that phrase. An Xbox Live Achievement is a soul-bound item, and Gamerpoints are experience points, and BioShock is a one-man instance dungeon in the Xbox Live MMO. That is the direction that single-player gaming is going, frankly.


    I think this is more and more becoming a reality. Even in the nailed-down online component of Mario-Kart Wii, there's the world-wide Time Trial leaderboard where you can download the ghost of the best recorded time on the planet and see if you can beat it, and if you do, upload that score and have worldwide bragging rights.

  • Patches (Score:2, Insightful)

    by dontPanik ( 1296779 )
    MMORPGs are constantly evolving games (or at least they should be) because people find exploits and the interactions must be kept fair. Consoles have more difficulties delivering these patches although with more widespread internet access among current generation consoles this is less of a problem.
  • I'm going to go with the Font Size as being the big reason behind most "MMOs" for consoles being glorified shooters.

    Final Fantasy XI, which was made for both the PC and the PS2, annoyed me to no end with their Ginormous unified chat box/action box. With combat events, private messages, chats, and system announcements all appearing in the same space, it was tremendously annoying to try to do more than one thing at a time.

    Voice chat should help this a bit, but text still dominates most of the MMO UI now and
    • Yes, the chat box was annoying. I set it up to use the smallest font size and to take as little space as possible. I also used the chat filters to only show what I needed to see. That made it usable for me. I sat close to my TV so having the chat size smaller wasn't a problem

  • ... between a console with a keyboard, console controller, optional mouse, the internet and a high-res TV, and a computer with a keyboard, console controller, optional mouse, the internet and a monitor?

    • [CronoCloud@midgar CronoCloud]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
      cpu :MIPS
      cpu model R5900 V3.1
      system type EE PS2
      BogoMIPS 392.39
      byteorder little endian
      unaligned accesses 1902
      wait instruction no
      microsecond timers no
      extra interrupt vector yes
      hardware watchpoint no
      VCED exceptions not available
      VCEI exceptions not available

      [CronoCloud@midgar CronoCloud]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
      PS2 Linux release 1.0

      Not much, really. Yeah I know, I need a PS3 so I can install YDL on it.

  • The most obvious reason: (Score:3, Funny)

    by icebike ( 68054 ) on Tuesday June 10, 2008 @04:46PM (#23736531)
    Why all the drama trying to figure out WHY these games disappear, when the fact that these were BORING from the beginning is patently obvious.
  • There are lots of reasons why MMOs don't work well on consoles, but the bottom line problem is how people play MMOs.

    I always run WoW in windowed mode, and I have friends who do the same. The game is designed and paced so that you don't have to concentrate 100% of the time. In fact, it's more like 50% of the time.

    That makes WoW more like a board game than a traditional video game. It's a social thing, in addition to a competitive thing.

    Voice chat sucks in MMOs. Yeah, most guilds use it for raids, and I use i

    • And, FYI, no console has 2560x1600 screen resolution (roughly double 1080p). And no console has a GPU that's even close to my Radeon HD 3850. This hardware isn't even "high end" anymore, it's definitively mainstream.
      If you think that 2560x1600 is mainstream, then you must hang around with billionaires.

      I suppose not having a keyboard and windows
  • Consoles are temporary niche,where fixed hardware(the console) has to compete with evolving hardware(the PC).When the PCs become much cheaper(~few decades),the niche will disappear along with all the gadgets which use one of PCs functions.
  • Star Wars Galaxy was supposed to be for the PS2 as well as for the PC. And there are some rumours that Age of Conan is to appear on the 360. If you know either game, you might realize the problem. Memory. The PS2 wasn't as powerful as PC's of that era, few game consoles ever are. The problem is simple, gamers get the latest intel/amd straight from the factory. But consoles need to be build around whatever tech has been developed. During the development Consoles always seem to be posses godlike powers but
    • You did know that the two biggest MMORPG's for consoles are PS2 games, FFXI and EQOA. I've played them both.

      They both do what the PS2 is very very good at, streaming data on the fly. Why keep textures in RAM when you can just stream them from storage, in EQOA's case it's the DVD, which means it's hard on PS2 DVD drives, if you're about to get DRE's you'll notice it in EQOA before other games. It also means that unless you directly port to a different zone, say from Freeport to Qeynos, you won't see load

Slashdot Top Deals

news: gotcha

Close