Mythic GM Talks Warhammer Launch, Banning Gold Sellers 251
Gamasutra has an interview with Mark Jacobs, GM and co-founder of Mythic, about the recent launch of Warhammer Online. He talks about handling the heavy demands on the servers, and how the launch is going better than the opening of Dark Age of Camelot (during which "somebody parked a truck on our internet"). Jacobs also blogged about the glee with which he and his team have been banning gold spammers: "We don't wait and let them stay in the game and ban them en-masse, my guys ban their useless, time-consuming butts right away. We have a strike team whose sole job it is to get these guys off our servers as quickly as possible. This weekend, we unveiled a new wrinkle in the fight against them, the public ban message. Players on our Phoenix Throne server have been treated to special messages when a gold seller/spammer is banned. I've given them a wide leash to come up with creative messages to tell the entire community who has been banned and we keep it within the Warhammer universe."
There was ONE hitch... (Score:2)
I'm unaware of whether any other servers faced this problem, but Azazel, at the very least, did not have scenarios (battlegrounds are the WoW equivalent) running on launch day (though that was fixed the next day) due to a bug or something as they worked during the head start or open beta.
How is it hard to prevent. (Score:3, Insightful)
I never understood how it was difficult to rid these guys.
Just send in some employee to buy some gold that is advertised...Then when you are given the gold, trace it back and ban that account along with the credit card info that was used to purchase the subscription. (As well as the product key)
Seriously it doesn't seem that hard.
Re:How is it hard to prevent. (Score:5, Funny)
You never understood how it could be difficult to ban people from making money by breaking the rules?
Man, you've never bought weed, have you?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:How is it hard to prevent. (Score:5, Funny)
The only true way to kill a parasite is to kill its host
I truly hope you are not a doctor.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I never understood how it was difficult to rid these guys.
Then you haven't thought about it.
Just send in some employee to buy some gold that is advertised...Then when you are given the gold, trace it back and ban that account along with the credit card info that was used to purchase the subscription. (As well as the product key)
Well duh!
1) The account that was used to transfer you the gold isn't the one that was used to farm it. Ideally, the accounts that actually do the transactions are "free" throwaway bu
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but it all happens on Blizzard's servers. Couldn't they, say, log all player-to-player gold transfers? Then, after locking on the "free" account, they could trace it back to actual gold farming accounts easily. Every paid accounts is, well, paid for, so if this technique was applied consistently, that should soon put gold farmers out of business.
If only it were that simple.
First, even if Blizzard were to try and do this the famers would resort to 'money laundering' within the game. Buying and selling
Re:How is it hard to prevent. (Score:5, Insightful)
Doh. bloody filter choked on 'less than symbol' $30 and clipped off most my post...
I never understood how it was difficult to rid these guys.
Then you haven't thought about it.
Just send in some employee to buy some gold that is advertised...Then when you are given the gold, trace it back and ban that account along with the credit card info that was used to purchase the subscription. (As well as the product key)
Well duh!
1) The account that was used to transfer you the gold isn't the one that was used to farm it. Ideally, the accounts that actually do the transactions are "free" throwaway buddy or trial accounts. (Which is why some of the more modern games have limits on those free trial accounts to limit how much gold they can actually have, to prevent them from transfering items at all, or from sending mail, or talking in certain chat channels, etc...) Not much use in banning the free throw-away account now is there?
2) Even if they can't use free throwaway accounts, then they use paid throwaway accounts. The accounts generally cost less than $30 bucks and gets them a free month. If they make at least 100% markup (and they do) than all they need is to sell $60 worth of gold before getting banned to break even. That's exceedingly easy to do. Hell, even if they get 'stung' by an employee, as long as they set it up so that they log in and fulfill all their orders at once, by the time the employee identifies the account, a couple hundred bucks worth of gold will have been moved and the farmer is ahead of the game.
3) Even banning a credit card isn't effective. These guys all pay by prepaid game card at best, or have prepaid visa debit cards etc, which can be obtained en masse trivially, never mind the potential for using stolen card numbers.
4) What mythic is doing by banning the spammer accounts is just stopping in-game advertising, not gold farming, or gold-sales. To do THAT is much harder, and there is little they can do to stop THAT, without very careful game design with that as a goal.
5) The gold farmers also are known to use hacked accounts. (where they've guessed or stolen user names and passwords of a legitimate customer, and use those accounts to move gold between farmer accounts and seller accounts, part of an in-game 'laundering' scheme). The 'victim' never even knows he's been hacked, because they just login for a few seconds to move THEIR gold around and don't otherwise interfere with the account at all.
This makes it difficult for the game-devs to act, because when they ban people suspected of being part of the gold-trade, they have to deal with the 'collateral damage'.
6) Of course, gold sellers also use hacked accounts for spamming sales.
Seriously it doesn't seem that hard.
Its FAR harder than it sounds.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. The grandparent forgets that the gold sellers are generally professional - you can bet they've thought about it.
There's lots of ways to move money around in an MMO to disguise where it's coming from and who it's going to. At the end of the day, after you've banned the mules, the bosses are still there.
You're right about the spamming/sales distinction (Score:2)
The smart thing to do, though, would be to leave the farmers themselves alone, but infiltrate and watch the money trail.
When the gold reaches the end customer, just take it away.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:How is it hard to prevent. (Score:4, Informative)
To pick an only slightly contrived example, an account playing from out-of-region for 36 solid hours starting at its activation is damn well a gold farmer. Oh, and there are other excessively long playtimes coming out of that same building, and the accounts travel the same paths and trade with each other? That's even MORE out of the range of legitimate normal players.
Apparently you've never been inside a university residence? ;)
Also, the ability to reliably ip trace to a building is really a feature of North America, there are places where nearly the entire country is NATed. Pro farmers set up operations there; they get a different IP address every couple days, and even that address is some 10.x thing behind their ISPs NAT. Blizzard can't block the ip or subnets; they'd block everyone in an entire city or even province.
There are a bunch of other damning statistics that would jump right out of the data too, I'm just naming a few for ease of conversation.
Yes, for what its worth I agree that logging usage patterns and profiling them for certain 'farming' patterns and login patterns could yield useful results. However, nothing jumps from the data all by itself, they would have to make a concerted effort to write tools to analyze logs and summarize the data.
A guild can look much like a farmer. Hell, they even power level, farm, dump piles of cash on 'bankers' and 'treasurers' and then from those treasures relay funds to members to make equipment purchases, fund their alts and 2nd box accounts, etc, etc, etc.
And a professional farming op, knowing that they were being profiled could relatively easily slip beneath the radar, by rotating accounts, mixing up farming areas, playing games with proxies, laundering the funds through the in game economy, etc. Running it like a 'terrorist' or spy network, using isolated cells, so if one cell is compromised it can't be traced to others, etc, etc, etc.
Consider this scenario: golf-farmers inc, operating in some place with dynamic dns where their ip changes every few days if not faster... they buy a few accounts, join random levelling guilds of which there are dozens in the game, power level like mad, then break away and farm with it. They rotate between multiple accounts doing the same thing. And transfer no gold), then one day they transfer all the accumulated gold directly to a bunch of other accounts, and then now that its transferred massive amounts of gold to people its never interacted with before, the farmer abandons it and gold-farmers inc uses it to spam ads into the chat-channels until Blizz shuts it down. The recipient accounts were all buyers. The farm account went from being beneath the radar to being practically discarded in 5 minutes flat. How do you profile that?
It would take more effort than you are willing to give credit for to develop tools to hunt them them down and filter them out without hassling a lot innocent players, many of whom power level, farm instances solo, and so on.
Re: (Score:2)
Gold farmers aren't just people who farm for gold. This is a misnomer. Gold farmers are organizations that can faithfully and repetitively reproduce effective gold farming patterns in SCALE without being involved in the MM part of the ORPG with the explicit intention of selling online resources (not just gold). Making up convoluted social requirements to pass an automated inspection, effectively breaks this model. That's the goal.
Re: (Score:2)
Gold farmers aren't just people who farm for gold. This is a misnomer. Gold farmers are organizations that can faithfully and repetitively reproduce effective gold farming patterns in SCALE without being involved in the MM part of the ORPG with the explicit intention of selling online resources (not just gold). Making up convoluted social requirements to pass an automated inspection, effectively breaks this model. That's the goal.
It won't work because a gold farming organization will have no trouble meeting
Re: (Score:2)
Or they could block gold transfers between avatars who have never talked previously, never played in the same area for at least 5 minutes, and gold transfers that don't have any in-game reciprocation?
1) Hi there, put a chunk of iron ore up in the auction house for 1,000,000 gold. I will buy it. Pleasure doing business with you.
2) Hi there, head to zone-X and start killing things. Play for 5 minutes. Check your mail. Pleasure doing business with you. ... etc ...
Even the rules for IRAs say that you can't cont
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I'm an MMO developer, and believe me, people have been working on this problem much longer than the 10 minutes it took you to think of that comment on Slashdot. If there were a solution that easy to reach, it would have been done and shared across all possible games a long time ago. Contrary to popular belief, MMO developers aren't drooling morons. Well, most aren't, anyway.
[S]ince when has "it's hard" been a valid excuse in engineering?
Since code sucks at determining human intent. Hell, humans have tro
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I'm an MMO developer, so I can speak with a bit of authority here.
We're talking about something that takes a GM seconds to judge here.
First, nothing takes seconds. A GM gets a report, then s/he has to look at the logs. What are the conditions under which the mail was sent? Was this a paying customer playing a stupid joke that a friend didn't get? Is this a gold farmer creating a noise to gum up the system? Is this the same idiot who keeps using the "report spam" button instead of the "delete" button, b
Re: (Score:2)
They don't even have to be that thorough, EULA and all that, they can ban you, your credit card, and your IP all in one go just for spamming, if they want. Heck, without double checking I'd be the EULA lets them ban you just because they feel like it (most EULAs do, because no-one reads them and it helps stop arguments over "fair" later).
The issue is that a lot of this can be automated. Traffic can be routed through compromised systems (good grief, it's not like their spam-bots are lag critical), accounts c
Re: (Score:2)
>Heck, without double checking I'd be the EULA lets
>them ban you just because they feel like it (most
>EULAs do, because no-one reads them and it helps
>stop arguments over "fair" later).
Too bad many (most?) countries have laws that doesn't alow you to just terminate a service you sold "for no reason" and won't allow for such a contract term in a consumer sold service either.
Re: (Score:2)
No its not hard at all. Don't implement trade, and there won't be any gold sellers. Of course, this has other gameplay implications.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. Trace the gold back, ban the account, pocket the profit. I did notice gold in warhammer is selling at prices like when wow was first released. More humorous, some of the warhammer goldsellers still advertise WOW gold sales.
I am very glad to see mythic taking action on this issue immediately, instead of waiting for years. Obviously they couldn't code a solution in 3 days, but they're using their GMs to make a public assault on the behavior. If they maintain that sense of urgency for making the
Embrace them or Ban them (Score:4, Insightful)
When you think about it though, Goldfarming is simply someone forcing outsourcing of your leisure time for you. You don't want it to happen, they undercut you (as their time is nearly worthless) and they screw up the economy.
Best of luck to them on this. Blizzard has completely failed in this aspect and their economy and absurd quests at times show it.
Re: (Score:2)
By contrast, games like Wurm [wurmonline.com] actively encourage users to simply purchase their in-game gold from their online store. Some players also sell in-game gold through forums at slightly lower rates.
Re: (Score:2)
Blizzard hasn't failed. Gold only gets you so far in WoW. At some point you have to go into dungeons and get the untradeable drops yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
Inside job? (Score:2)
Should be easy to ban. I don't go more than five minutes without a tell from a different person advertising gold.
I've always wondered if gold sellers have someone working for them on the inside. Diablo 2, for example, had item sellers selling all of the best top tier items and runes approximately 3 hours after the ladder reset and everyone had to start fresh on the lader.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Somebody parked a big truck on my series of tubes! (Score:2)
"somebody parked a truck on our internet"
That would put a big crimp in the tubes.
What is the problem? (Score:3, Insightful)
Let's use WoW and it's epic flying price of 5000g for example. I ground 5k gold twice, the first time on a character I never play anymore due to a server and faction change, the second time on the differently factioned replacement. The grind is boring! And it's equally boring to have to do it a second time or more. Does someone paying $200 for 5k gold to pay for their epic flyer negatively affect the me or the game? Nope.
Also, what about people just starting in the game after others have been in for years? They have a lot of trouble catching up to their friends. Purchasing gold can help them get there faster so they can be more interested in the game. I bet mature MMOs have probably lost a lot of opportunities to get players because coming into the game now is just too late. The same argument goes for leveling services.
Frankly, there are no downsides to gold farming unless the farmers are preventing other players from doing something, like camping mob spawns. From my experience, they have very little affect on the economy as long as gold isn't the only way to advance your character.
Wait, the random tells are annoying. But other than that what is there? The real problem is that someone is making money 'at the expense' (used very loosely) of the game designer and that wasn't intended. But that's called capitalism. Obviously it's a service people want, so why not give it to them? I would only ban gold sellers who advertise in game or in official forums and let people play the game as they like.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Who says it's cheating? If your friend gives you items or gold that's cheating too by your point of view. The only difference is that there is real money involved.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't understand your logic. Using the in game transfer system to transfer gold you bought online is cheating. However, buying a strategy guide or a subscription to a website with tons of data is perfectly alright? The data you pay for in the strategy guide or map site is all composed by someone in the real world. Gold is composed by someone in the real world. Sharing it with someone for a fee or not is the same in both situations.
I don't like gold farmers as much as the next guy (it makes it hard to
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't understand your logic. Using the in game transfer system to transfer gold you bought online is cheating. However, buying a strategy guide or a subscription to a website with tons of data is perfectly alright? The data you pay for in the strategy guide or map site is all composed by someone in the real world. Gold is composed by someone in the real world. Sharing it with someone for a fee or not is the same in both situations.
It's the difference between gaining knowledge to help you in the game, and
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The problem, regardless of what Blizzard may say, is that it has the potential to reduce income for Blizzard. If I pay $15 per month to play the game and then pay a goldfarmer a few hundred more so that I can instantly have access to all the nifty junk I want I can play for a few months and then perhaps get bored and cancel my account.
Blizzard wants me to put in the hours/weeks/months for each and every item I want so that I have a reason to log in and play so that I keep paying that $15 month after month.
Re: (Score:2)
I think many game companies will want to try to avoid the extra regulation that comes when you start allowing things that make the "real world" illegal stuff easier.
Re: (Score:2)
The reasons are pretty simple, gold sellers and gold farmers make the game less fun for everyone else so that they can make a buck.
Whether it's the mobs that are instantly tagged and killed, the materials that sell for next to nothing on the auction hall, the jerk that sits there yelling "Ch3ap G0ld N0W", the asshole who's uploading trogan horse programs to MMO related web sites to hack your account, or the simply the fact that you bought your way out of the fun of the game, it's just less fun when gold far
overly public bans (Score:2)
What I think would be cool is to implement a reporting system like the above and the offenders will be silenced from sending global messages a
Re: (Score:2)
because whole guilds wouldn't exploit that now would they...
Re: (Score:2)
Yet another reason why guilds are the downfall of the MMO. I could go on for pages on how guilds destroy socialization, trading, zone balance, quest balance, balance in general... but I'll just take the mod point hits for saying that guilds are the unions of modern day America. A lot of people looking for a easy ride who don't understand that they are only hurting themselves and making some power hungry cock sucker even more powerful.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"What I think would be cool is to implement a reporting system like the above and the offenders will be silenced from sending global messages after a certain number of people report them."
Bad idea. Large groups of people will grief regular players by mass reporting them.
What would be better is to design the game in such a way that people don't want to buy gold, they'd rather play.
Personally, I think a game like WoW would be MUCH better off if they simply allowed gold to be irrelevant - make it so all the st
Liability is the problem. (Score:2)
The problem with a company allowing RW gold sales is that suddently theyve suddently attached a real monetary value to a virtual item and opened themselves up to countless liabilities.
Say they alow gold selling, sudently all the items in your inventory are worth possibly thousands of dollars. Then what happens if your account gets hacked, or theres a server crash or something. What are you going to do? Sue the company for the value of your virtual items.
It is much easier for the companies to say, gold selli
Nice work if I can get it. (Score:2)
I need a gig. Can I be on your strike team? How much does it pay? I don't have to move to Ohio, do I?
Lies, lies and damn lies (Score:2)
Hah, what a huge lie. Warhammer Europe launch was quite bad, for example compared to the LOTRO launch a year earlier. It is also obvious they shipped the game too early - because it lacks a lot of polish. There are a lot of obvious bugs that I've encountered in the first 10 or so minutes:
- The registration process for online downloads is convulted
- The game forces you to accep
I like it (Score:2)
I saw the popup about someone being punished by the king or something, and later another about someone and was like "WTF?".
My initial response was that this was probably futile, but these guys are annoying to the extent that they interfere with other peoples' experience by their invasive spamming. They have to spam in-game to advertise, so I guess it's not impossible for the dev's to keep on them, esp if they implement some sort of 'reporting' function like Blizzard has for inappropriate spam comments. Re
Re: (Score:2)
I got one too. I've never actually seen anyone spamming for gold though.
I'm not even sure why you would want to buy gold in WAR. The only thing I've ever found that I would have liked to do but couldn't do due to lack of player funds was redye (color) my entire outfit. Hardly a real hardship, as that stuff is just going to get replaced by better gear 20 minutes later anyway...
this seems like the war on drugs (Score:2)
This MMORPG war on gold farming just seems to me like the USA's ridiculous War on Drugs. It seems to me that these things are true:
My point is, from an observational standpoint, those two things appear to be facts. Therefore, fighting this is going to consume lots of time and resources (the game makers admit to having a "strike team" specifically for this purpose, which I assume costs them money), and at the end of the day, strike
I got one of those (Score:3, Interesting)
I was playing last night and got one of those messages. I wish I'd written it down now, but it was something along the lines of "Emperor Frobozz has banished Ruetard for activies against the empire". I was playing my empire ("good" human) priest at the time.
I figured it *probably* meant they had just booted a gold-farmer, but it was kinda hard to be sure from the message.
Its kind of cool to see that, but they did it rather annoyingly. They didn't put the message in the chat window, and didn't have it come up as big text on your play window either. They put it in a pop-up window that you had to dismiss by clicking on the "OK" button. If I'd been in the middle of a furball at the time that could have been deadly. I still *had* to stop what I was doing to read the darn thing and click it away.
Re: (Score:2)
I play, and I like it.
-Rick
Re: (Score:2)
I bought it, but I can't say I "play" because that would imply I use it more than 15 minutes before the damn thing crashes. I'm sure it'd be quite fun if it worked. But I've got the latest drivers for all my hardware, I'm within spec, and it crashes, and crashes, and crashes, and crashes.
Maybe in a few months they'll release something that isn't beta quality crapware and then I'll be able to play and enjoy my $50 purchase. I mean, hell, Dwarf frickin' Fortress, officially in "highly unstable alpha" doesn
Re: (Score:2)
Wierd, since the head start launch, my wife and I have crashed to desktop a grand total of 3 times. 2 of those times were due to a bug in leaving scenarios and was patched before the head start ended. The 3 time was running around Altdorf, which I can only compare to running around Ironforge 3 years ago. No idea what your problem is, but I'd double check on those drivers, audio and video are the biggies, but make sure your NIC and mobo drivers are up to date as well.
-Rick
Re:thinking about it (Score:5, Informative)
I throw out the phrase "Better than WoW" after a long period of due consideration. It's not just hype - it's really that good.
The only problem I have with it is that there are a few glitches they haven't quite ironed out yet (animations getting stuck, occasionally a HUD window will vanish for no reason), so I would give it a month.
Re: (Score:2)
"Being a dragon is all fun and games till some tincan bastard comes and shoves a sword in your throat."
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Occasionally, my character will animate as though he/she's unarmed even though she's holding a weapon. Also, weapon trails will occasionally continue to be shown for a minute or so after the animation is finished.
That's what I mean, though I do see my summary left a lot to be desired.
Re: (Score:2)
For your analogy to work, you'd only be cutting two classes from the 9 rather than 6, but I appreciate your point.
I would, however, very much doubt that the cities and classes will be out of the game for very long, and doubt further that they'll have to be paid for considering the way they were removed, but that's just me. I'm not feeling very cynical tonight, which makes a change.
Re:thinking about it (Score:4, Interesting)
I picked it up, along with a bunch of friends, and we're all LOVING it. :)
They really hit this one out of the park IMHO, I've no doubt that they will do really well with this game.
I can't see myself ever going back to WoW.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Except that the zones feel pretty dense, at least at the low levels. I've noticed myself doing a ton less running than I did in WoW at comparable levels.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Things I liked:
The biggest reason for me quitting WoW was the time commitment in the end game
Re: (Score:2)
WoW had no big time committment until you've played for quite some time to get to the endgame. Is War just the same, or can you really be sure the endgame won't be all multi-hour raids?
Re: (Score:2)
I've gotten the sense that Mythic has learned that adding long multigroup raids to their previous game, Dark Age of Camelot, was a huge mistake. Dark Age of Camelot was a really great game, and I think they've taken the good elements from it and left behind the bad ones when making WAR.
Re:thinking about it (Score:4, Informative)
It's fun. A lot like WoW, but does a lot of things better/more fun, like how mana regenerates and how Public Quests work.
The GM is right though. Gold spam is starting already.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Iâ(TM)ve been offered âoea piece of the actionâ both personally and corporately in the past if I will either turn a blind eye or help them in their actions. This would have netted me and/or Mythic a very, very tidy sum, far more than we would see from box sales. My answer was and always will remain the same:
Go to hell.
I must say.. he is legend. Hopefully this type of behavior will stay 2-3 years down the road and not fall down the uncaring path that all big MMORPGs always do.
Re:thinking about it (Score:4, Interesting)
I like it, I played wow for a few years but got tired of the arena-or-raid focus (I like BGs, but it is pointless after a while because of people afking to get honor to buy gear to do arena) and decided to give war a try and I am glad I did.
It does seem very casual friendly for now at least, you can queue up for bgs from anywhere (yay) and it will port you back wherever you were afterwards (not at the battlemaster, yay). PQs are nice, and in general it seems to be the type of game that does not have intentional timesinks thrown in for no good reason (like wow, all the reputations etc.). Gear seems also much much much less the focus than wow, which works well. I also like how quests give you 'hints' on the map about where to go, and the whole tome of knowledge is nice.
If they can manage to keep a critical mass of subscribers for a few months they definitely have a good chance, the real test will be when wotlk or 3.0.2 come out, will people stick with WAR or not? I am sure blizz is going to release 3.0.2 ASAP just to get people back to play with all the new talents.
In terms of annoyances I can list not being able to activate AA (some jaggies, even at 1920), having to sit through the cinematic logos every time, having to accept the TOC every time, having to give UAC permission every time, but that's about it.
I am also pleasantly surprised by how 'well sorted' the UI feels, considering how I had 100+ add-ons in WOW and haven't felt the need of most of them in WAR (save for Grid and for being able to customize the chat window a bit more)
Re:thinking about it (Score:4, Interesting)
I played EQ, WoW, and beta tested SWG.
I have to say, I am most pleased with this game.
I fucking HATE gear grinds for end game content. I am notorious for soloing and not joining guilds because games shouldn't be scheduled work. I quit EQ early on because of it, I never saw endgame in WoW because of it, and well SWG just sucked. That having been said, I really enjoy the public quests, Scenario, and open RvR elements of WAR.
I always shied away from PvP because it was always seemed a gear and lvl based system trying to placate people who wanted large scale combat. I have to say that so far in WAR even a casual player can enjoy RvR.
The scenarios level balance when you enter them. Now, you don't get new abilities that you don't have - but you can at least compete. The higher levels of a tier do seem to have an easier time of it, but crappy tactics can't be made up for with l33t g34r.
The public quests sometimes suck when there aren't enough people to overcome the second and third stages, but they reset after a short time (read minutes) and you can play the low events over and over again for the point rewards.
The open RvR areas are really boss. Just running out to an area and fighting others is an awesome visceral experience. There is no corpse runs, so getting back into the game is simple. There is a brief "death debuff", but that is easily dealt with by paying a healer to remove when you respawn. BTW, you respawn right next to a healer.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:thinking about it (Score:4, Interesting)
Just so you kno, a lot of those "WoW conventions" were pretty much invented by other games. World of Warcraft is simply the latest (and most successful to date) in a line of MMO titles that have evolved from common ancestry. Everquest used to be the game of choice. In Asian markets, Lineage had WoW-like numbers far before Blizzard had an MMO offering. And the first large-scale commercial MMO of significance here in the US was Ultima Online. And of course, all these games borrowed liberally from online text-only MUDs.
In a somewhat humorous twist, Blizzard is somewhat notorious for.. shall we say.. liberally borrowing concepts from the Warhammer universe. Not slamming Blizzard, they make awesome stuff, but please be aware the genre did not start with WoW.
Penny Arcade summed it up best, of course: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/04/10/ [penny-arcade.com]
WAR: Taint Of The Half Arse (Score:4, Informative)
Well, I've played it for a couple of days, since I'm bored to tears with WoW by now. It's certainly not a horrible game, and there isn's even much "bad" about it, but it's certainly not half as polished as WoW. There's probably some gem in there, but unfortunately nobody tried much to separate it from the rock, much less give it a shine. In other words, it's yet another half-arsed, me-too attempt at milking the MMO market.
In fact, probably the best thing that can be said about it, is that it copied WoW shamelessly. It's a good thing, really. WoW did figure out the righ gameplay by now. And yes, I really mean clone. E.g., Witch Elves and Witch Hunters work _exactly_ like WoW Rogues. They build up combo points, then spend them on finisher moves. In fact, they may even be renamed "bloodlust points" and "accusation points" respectively, but at least one tooltip still calls them "combo points." E.g., Ironbreakers (dwarf tanks) work almost exactly like WoW warriors, with 0 to 100 "grudge points" that build up as you hit or are hit. Are you thinking "rage points" too, Pinky? Only dumbly enough, they didn't understand the role of that mechanic on WoW, like the difference between burst damage and sustained damage, so as a warrior you're _also_ stuck with a mana bar. Etc.
The downside isn't that it's a clone, that it's yet another half-arsed, shove-me-out-the-door-patch-me-later clone.
To understand what I'm talking about, just look at the web site. Two days after release, it was still talking about preordering, and it was telling me things like that I don't need to register my preorder code again. When in fact, I was registering the game key for the first time. They didn't even bother updating the web site. Now I'm certainly not playing the web site, so it's not a vital issue, but it serves to illustrate the half-arsed attitude I was talking about. Rest assured that it's reflected in the actual game too.
Ok, to the game itself. The first thing that happens, is that promptly at the list of servers the game informs me that server X needs more players. Do I accept? Well, ok. Good thing I decide to double-check that choice, because it turns out to be an open PvP server. (Ok, ok, RvR.) Normally the game seems to ask, basically, "do you really want that?" when you choose such a server. But IIRC if I'm goaded via such a dialog, it didn't. Though maybe that was still one step too early, because when I see "Open RvR", I'm out of there. Way to make friends with your potential customers by trying to shaft them out of choosing a type of server they like.
I pick a new server and start by creating a character. As it happens, on the Destruction side. I play with it for a bit, and, being the altaholic that I am, figure out I'll see if there's an equivalent on the Order side. I need to go to another server for that, though, and honestly I have no problem with that. I like to keep my characters sorted like that anyway.
Again comes a dialog asking me to join realm Y, 'cause it needs more players. I'm weary, but say "OK." Immediately comes a prompt saying that the realm is full and I'd face queues if I play there. What. The. Fuck? It just told me they need more players on a full server?
Ok, I pick another one, toy with character creation for a bit, want to go back to my first one on the other server. But, as it happens, the server names say nothing to me (I'm not a tabletop buff or anything), so I forgot its name. But that's ok, because it has a column in the server list which says how many characters you have on a server. And an option to sort by it. So finding the server should be a two second affair, right? Wrong, because it's non-functional and says 0 for all servers.
After a brief scare that it lost my character, I resolve to do it by brute force and perseverence, by joining and leaving each bloody server in the list, until one has my character in the list. Yep, that's some time lost just because they can't even finish the very first list you'll see, before they release the game. The impressio
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
As a consumer, sadly, I don't give a flying fuck about what their excuse is. They both cost the same, they both are the same kind of product, so it's very fair to ask, "which of them gives me more bang for my buck?" If WoW is the more fun one (for my subjective tastes), then that's that, really.
I mean, if I opened a restaurant and started serving (quite literally) s
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I want to like it too, for much the same reasons. It just doesn't give me all that much to go by, other than, "well, at least technically it's not WoW." :P
As for the bugs, I _think_ they're performance related. I played it on two computers, a high end one, and a rather ancient box. That on the latter it's a slideshow, is pretty much expected. But what's interesting is that also on the lame box going through walls or half-way through doors seems to happen a lot more. It's as if, when texture swap hits,
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I never play a game that won't give me a trial. Sorry, to many choices out there, money to tight to spend 50 bucks on something I throw away. I'll stick with WoW.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:thinking about it (Score:4, Informative)
Cut my teeth on UO. Played a bunch of others. The ones I spent significant time in were AC, SWG, and EVE.
The game is good. He's not kidding with the RvR. You can literally create a character and click the enter scenario (battelground) button as your first action. Oh you're level one? So what? RvR is broken into tiers. T1 is levels 1-11. If you're below 8 you get buffed up to level 8. T2 buffs you to level 18 if you are below, etc. You don't have to be at the top of the bracket to compete.
You can join queues from anywhere. No running to town. Each area also has an open world RvR area with objectives to capture.
When you join a scenario you are auto added to a party.
One of my favorite mechanics is the open party system. It's like lfg/meeting stones except it works. You can set your party as open and anyone in the area can see you on the list and join. Also anyone in a party can "refer" someone to the party leader. You click them and select invite and the party leader gets a pop up saying Bob wants Alice invited y/n. Find a group is basically effortless.
The public quests are scripted outdoor events. For example the newb orc/gobbo one is as follows. Giant/Ogre thing is being chased by little annoying mobs. 30 of them must be killed. Then the giant sits down and complains about being thirsty so the group has to run around and grab 20 beer barrels. Then the giant gets up and knocks down the doors of a dwarf keep that this is happening outside. A dwarf leader comes out. He sends a couple waves at the group then he attacks with some henchmen. As you complete tasks you get influence which allow you to pick rewards in the town that quest is near. Also at the end of the quest a loot roll is made based on participation and persistance and you may get a loot bag. 2.5 minutes after the loot roll the quest resets and starts over. Also some stages are times and if not completed in time the whole quest will reset. This is mainly a mechanic to prevent them from advancing due to one person grinding for an extended period.
The scenarios are good. I've played capture and hold the CPs and a "flag runner" mechanic one. That one you have to grab the flag then interact with 3 land marks scattered around the instance. That one is a bit wonky because people never seem to know the rules. There's also a standard CTF but I've never made it into an instance on that.
The general pace of combat is a bit slower. Tanks are more tanky and healers heal more. I play a black orc (greenskin tank class) and I can soak sick amounts of damage. Put a healer on me and you have to take the healer out or put 6 or more people on me. I find myself switching targets a lot looking for the guy the healers aren't watching. Snares and roots are very effective killing tools because they allow you to cull someone from the pack. Bascially in RvR you have to work together. Two people just going toe to toe is often a sustained battle. Except for overwhelming forces 8-1 there are few quick kills.
This is getting long. I can talk more if you have questions. In summary: If you like RvR then give the game a try. If you don't like RvR but are a fan of the warhammer world I'd still say pick it up. They're very true to the world. My black orc has a skill called "Right in Da Jibblies."
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You didn't pick up your pre-order?! People like you are why it's impossible to find a store that will hold a game for you.
Re: (Score:2)
Same boat here, I just can't trust Mythic to get it right. Too bad really, as the Warhammer universe is cool.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, they did screw that up royally. The concept of balancing a 3-team game is so phenomenally simple that it defies belief that they failed as spectacularly as they did.
Re: (Score:2)
I quit around the time of Bone Dancers, castable endurance buff for shamans, and Savage quad hit insta gib and Berserker left axe insta gib all being in the game at one time. It was just stupid at that point, no reason to even play.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's probably why Blizzard does that, too. More boxes bought = more money for them.
Re: (Score:2)
Nice! About time someone took a proactive stance to gold farmers. They just present a way for the lazy player to get ahead.Nice! About time someone took a proactive stance to gold farmers. They just present a way for the lazy player to get ahead.
Personally, I have nothing against gold farmers and those who support them, but its really annoying and retarded in WAR because:
A.) They are spamming public channels and sending tells to everyone.
B.) There is no need for gold grind.
In fact the only thing that I can
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The trade itself isn't so inherently bad. It cheapens the experience and skews the economy, but both are more "meh" than "argh". Personally, I think Everquest was on to a good idea by having a "gold trade enabled" server where it was officially an option, for everyone who wanted to do it, without messing with the majority of the game.
The real issue comes from the spam, the account theft, the gold farmers, and basically all the side-effects of the trade.
Re: (Score:2)
You mistake is measuring your self-worth by in-game status symbols. Play the game because it's fun to play, not to show off your "accomplishments" (as if seat-time were something to be proud of), and stop playing if you spend your time doing something that's not fun.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Wow.. you're right. Someone call the president we have to get a law in place to regulate....
.
.
isn't this a video game?
Someone traded time for money... guess what you do it every day when you go to work, assuming you work.
However you got to have the fun of building the character, they traded their hard earned money to get a character they may not have had the time to invest in. Would you deny someone the experience of the endgame because they don't have 5 hours a day for 2 months to sit around grinding to ge
Re: (Score:2)
Would you deny someone the experience of the endgame because they don't have 5 hours a day for 2 months to sit around grinding to get there?
Yep.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So you skip the bulk of the game just so you can pour money into feeling good about yourself for beating people who actually enjoy the game? I normally say "to each his own", but buying game currency to get ahead is really no better than playing Diablo II with an edited character against people who actually put some effort in.
In a more general sense, it's people like you (but by your logic probably far better, since they're richer) that ruin democracies by buying the legislation they want and keeping the p
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
but rather triggering money-making actions forcing the server to generate more money. When you have a market for that you'll have thousands of characters exclusively dedicated to generate more money. It causes inflation.
So kind of like what Wall Street has been doing lately. Gold Farmer economics?