UltraHLE Author Calls it Quits 75
Randy Scott writes "RealityMan, co-author of UltraHLE, is dropping out of the emulation scene. He states his reasons here. The rumor that UltraHLE would make a return in one form or another is confirmed by Foxy's Weekly Column, but this was before RealityMan's departure. I'm not sure what the state of UltraHLE is at this point... "
Does UltraHLE work in the latest WINE? (Score:1)
Save me the trouble of downloading it and watching wine segfault
----------------- ------------ ---- --- - - - -
nuts (Score:1)
Re: Why don't computers get 128bit? (Score:1)
In non-graphics ops, I seriously doubt the "2 or 3 PII's" thing... care to document? (Maybe it does womp up on floating point performance... but if that kind of all-round performance could be done that cheaply, would someone not have one out for the computer?)
[Disclaimer: I'm not taking my Systems Architecture class 'till next year, and may be talking out my ass]
Still haven't quite figured out (Score:1)
How his complaints don't amount to:
"there are people who take advantage of the work I do for their own personal use. They aren't l33t like me and don't like to make emulators. Therefore I resign"
What a stupid immature attitude. What if linus had said the same thing? What about RMS and co. If they had all quit the second the suits moved into linux, it would be a big loss.
So fine. Get out of emulation if you want. Someone else will come along, who is hopefully not so unbelievably obtuse.
What are you talking about (Score:1)
1) I am not RMS
2) My reference to him was utterly tangential
3) My original post had little to do with the free software movement
4) As someone else mentioned, if you run linux you are indeed a hypocrite.
RMS: Please quit linux scene (Score:1)
Which he deserves...without him there would be no concept of "free software" or the GNU, and GNOME (as well as most of Linux) would never have existed.
-W.W.
Why don't they release source? (Score:1)
--
128 bits? Naah.. -> probably. (Score:1)
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for now. Besides, have you seen the MPEG movies? They claim they were made in real time.
UltraHLE = UltraHassle (Score:1)
Umm - My understanding is that people make apps in order to fill a need. I am also under the impression that a video game emulator fills the need of a 'game player'. Put two and two together, you get four. How can the 'scene' possibly go downhill when there is demand for the main function of a program? What the hell is up with that? What SHOULD people do with emulators, replace their word processor?!?
Sounds to me like we're getting into the 'more 31337 than you' mentality. The moment something gets popular, it suddenly becomes uncool or supposedly ruined.
Err, yeah.
- Darchmare
- Axis Mutatis, http://www.axismutatis.net
Does UltraHLE work in the latest WINE? (Score:1)
RMS: Please quit linux scene PLEASE (Score:1)
I can almost certainly say that RMS had a hand in the development of ALL those packages because their authors probably used gdb and emacs as a development environment. Not to mention that the license under which those software have been released (and which has allowed you to use them with such freedom) was RMS's idea.
Has your own work even had a fraction of the impact of RMS's on the lives of so many people?
UltraHLE, PSX2, etc (Score:1)
UltraHLE, PSX2, etc (Score:1)
Bleh..hope for the best, I guess. (Score:1)
Emulate something else (Score:1)
Canada isn't socialist (Score:1)
Emulation "scene" (Score:1)
--=:[GeNERiC^ANSi^PRoDUCTioNs][iNC][o2.o3.96]:=--
128 bits? Naah.. (Score:1)
64 bit wide chips (or worse
TA
UltraHLE = UltraHassle (Score:1)
Bowie
UltraHLE = UltraHassle (Score:1)
Bleh..hope for the best, I guess. (Score:1)
Building an emulator so people can learn from it, and perhaps even develop for it is one thing (and thats cool) but to abuse it for the sake of running pirated ROMs is quite another. One is a learning experience, the other is essentially a crime.
Bowie
128 bits? Naah.. (Score:1)
john
UltraHLE, PSX2, etc (Score:1)
Release the Source Code (Score:1)