Phantom Shows Pictures, Pricing, Huang Hire 121
HawKe writes "Audioholics reports today on details of Infinium Labs' new Phantom Gaming Service which is to be unveiled at this year's E3 in Los Angeles. The service looks to be geared towards a wider demographic rather than the hard core gamer, but for the price of included Phantom hardware (basically free) it appears to be a good compromise - the article explains the PC 'console' is 'free of charge to consumers who sign a two-year contract for a basic subscription to its flagship online gaming service at $29.95 per month. Consumers can also opt to buy this advanced gaming 'receiver' and required accessories without a commitment for $199'." S!: GameDaily also has a feature interviewing Infinium's Kevin Bachus, in which it's confirmed: "Infinium is concerned about protecting its IP and its consumers. To that end, Bachus and Infinium have hired Andrew Huang, the MIT grad student who gained fame for hacking the Xbox."
Hmm... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Hmm... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Hmm... (Score:4, Funny)
you're half right, but it's really all about developers, developers, developers, developers...
J
Re:Hmm... (Score:1, Funny)
Perhaps they are targetting a Linux market? You never know.
Re:Hmm... (Score:1)
Re:Hmm... (Score:1)
If I had to guess what's going on, it sounds like what they're offering is just a standardized, optimized to play games on a TV, free/cheap Windows XP box, and offering to sell you normal Windows XP games that have been pre-configure/pre-approved to run on your specific setup.
Kinda like what the other console
eat or feed...? (Score:4, Interesting)
Yay, a limited PC. (Score:5, Informative)
* AMD® Athlon(TM) XP 2500+ central processing unit (CPU)
* NVIDIA® GeForce(TM) FX 5700 Ultra graphics processing unit (GPU)
* NVIDIA® nForce(TM)2 Ultra 400 platform processor
* 256 MB RAM
* 40 GB local content cache
* Microsoft® Windows® XP Embedded Operating System
* Dynamic, personalized user interfaces customizable for age, gender or technical expertise
* Lapboard, mouse and game pad included
* HDTV and Dolby Digital 5.1 compatible
* Works any consumer-standard broadband Internet Service Provider (ISP): DSL or faster
This is different from a computer? How? There's nothing that would make me buy this, except for possibly the price. If it's as cheap as a GC I might consider
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:1)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:1)
Hmm... maybe something might be a problem, XP Embedded doesn't seem to be as free as it was before (was it any different, can't remember) anymore
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:3, Interesting)
I think the idea is that a.) there's a stable platform to develop to as opposed to the barrage of Frankenstein'esque computers causing developers needless hassle. b.) Games are delivered to your computer directly via internet as opposed to buying shrinkwrap stuff at the store.
I doubt this'll change your mind. That wasn't my goal. Simply
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:3, Insightful)
It sounds less and less like a good deal when you make an attempt to find problems where there, at the moment, are none. Really, the value of it won't be determined until launch. In the mean time, being skeptical isn't being particularly helpful.
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:1)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
About half. But you gotta buy the games and you also gotta buy the system. In the case of Indrema, you don't have to buy the system, but I have NFI if free games come with it or not. All I meant to suggest was that it might be part of it, and it'd be a damned good idea for them to.
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:3, Interesting)
That's some semi-decent hardware for $199. If the phantom does indeed come out with these specs and price, won't people just take em apart for the guts?
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Oh lord, does that mean every time they do something to thwart hackers trying to install Linux for no particularly good reason, it'll make headline news on Slashdot?
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
$199 per machine and there is an Athlon XP 2500+ in each machine. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!
No, seriously. Imagine it.
Surely the parts alone are worth far, far more than $199. I mean it's cheaper than the Xbox was at launch, except the specs on this are actually decent for a computer at the time of release, whereas the Xbox's Celeron was unimpressive.
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Someone is going to open it up and find out how to connect an optical (or diskette) drive to the machine. Given that they're using a PC CPU, GPU, and the nForce2 motherboard, I'm guessing that's going to be pretty easy. Maybe you wouldn't be able to salvage the games that you're renting from them (indeed, that's what Phantom's game service is touted to be... blockbuster for PC titles), but it's a decently powerful PC
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
But they are planning to launch it at the end of this year
Indeed... (Score:5, Funny)
Geforce FX 5700 Ultra? Why not "32GB 12-Way Tungstamech Neurogrouts bring you entertainment straight out of the Matrix"? Athlon XP? Why not "Vast arrays of processors shifting in and out of different dimensions deliver impossible computing power while tearing at the fabric of space-time"? Online game rentals? Why not "Direct stimulation of your brain's pleasure centers and direct fine-grained control of all matter in the universe"?
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:1)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Free for 1 year service. 29.95 * 12 = 359.40
That's a pretty cheap Linux PC, I'd say. Can I crack the case open and load Red Hat?
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
Hey better yet you pay me 25 a month for a year and I'll give you one. You save 59.40 and I make 101. (Unit for sale at $199 without the monthly service)
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
It's even cheaper if you just pay the $199 up front and don't subscribe.
The thing that interests me at the moment is that ATA controllers usually support two disks, so even though they're saying there will be no DVD-ROM drive in the computer, there will only be a master connected to the ATA controller. It might be possible to hack in an external DVD drive of some sort like it supposedly is for the Xbox. So the only limitation might go away.
Alternatively they might hack the unit so badly that you can't i
Re:Yay, a limited PC. (Score:2)
I thing $199 ia a decent price for the hardware included, and once used ones hit ebay these will be nice to mod into "regular" PCs.
Assuming we ever see these hit the market in real life, who wants to take bets on how long till it runs Linux?
This is all the computer most people need and in a nice case to boot.
Concerned indeed... (Score:5, Insightful)
Right... those mod chips have a way of crawling into your home and installing themselves, ruining your valuable data. Better protect the consumers!
Re:Concerned indeed... (Score:2)
Its been a philosophy of mine that the way a company refers to the people who give it money is a pretty good indicator of how they treat them.
For clarification, I define "consumers" as wallets which are expendable, which under no circumstances should be catered to.
Customers on the other hand are people whos money needs to be earned, and who the company is willing to make an effort to please in order to g
price (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:price (Score:1)
$30*24 months = $720 for two years of what?
At least with PS2, GC, XBox and PC I own something at the end of it. The conceptual idiocy of some of these yahoos who can't wait to charge me every time I find enjoyment in something makes my eyes bleed.
Technology is supposed to make things cheaper, not more expensive. Idiots who can't get their tiny little heads around this will continue to be very temporary market players.
Re:price (Score:1)
But atleast if you buy this thing, they can't sue you for screwing with it.
Parts? (Score:2, Insightful)
-Stu
Re:Parts? (Score:1)
Safe Harbor Statement? (Score:5, Insightful)
Safe Harbor Statement
Certain statements included in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from such statements expressed or implied herein as a result of a variety of factors including, but not limited to: the development of the Infinium Labs technology, the successful marketing and distribution of the Phantom Gaming System, acceptance by the market of Infinium Labs, products and technology, competition and timing of projects and trends in the gaming industry, as well as other factors expressed from time to time in filings Infinium Labs will make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). As a result, this press release should be read in conjunction with periodic filings Infinium Labs makes with the SEC. The forward looking statements contained herein are made only as of the date of this press release, and Infinium Labs undertakes no obligation to publicly update such forward looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
Anyways... those pictures look pretty manipulated, can't really say why. The lighting is way the hell too bright for one. And also, whats with that ONE cable on the front? First, it looks like it is in a different place in each of the pictures. Also, are they intending to sell a one controller console? I understand its for PC games, but even the XBOX has like 4 controllers.
Now, lets humor the guy for a moment, and ignore the past terrible PR, lack of evidence of a product, bandwidth costs for this guy to stream whole games, etc. Who would spend $30 a month for two years to rent a console? Thats $720! You could buy an XBOX, Gamecube, and PS2 for that price, and still have money for some games.
Re:Safe Harbor Statement? (Score:3, Informative)
Derr. They had it profesionally photographed. That involves very controlled lighting, plus they cut/paste it out for the page. (Or maybe it's CG.. Not that I can tell, but not beyond the abilities of a relatively talented artist.)
"Who would spend $30 a month for two years to rent a console? Thats $720!"
Doofus, they're not renting the system, they're including it if you subscrib
Re:Safe Harbor Statement? (Score:3, Insightful)
As for the money, technically you're right. Get past the press release and FUD, you're paying $720 to get a free console. So what you're really paying is ~$22 rather than $30. That subscription fee is paying for access to the network and some free games. You're forgetting that there are premium games that cost extra
Re:Safe Harbor Statement? (Score:2)
You're correct, at least as far as the known facts goes. However, since we don't know what those games are, it's an issue that really cannot be settled today. Just remember they're going to have a hard time competing with Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft
Re:Safe Harbor Statement? (Score:2)
But isn't not having content something wrong? I think that pretty much everyone can agree that the hardware is secondary to the content available to the system. If the Phantom was able to secure several AAA t
Re:Safe Harbor Statement? (Score:2)
I can usually agree with your posts, but not this one.
$30/mo for games that I can already play for free on any of the major portals? Additional fees to play other games? Sorry, but I'm not interested.
Microsoft had announced about a half-dozen titles that were supposed to be AAA at least a year before the XBox was released (Amped, Halo, Oddworld, and Malice come to mind) -- nevermind th
Re:Safe Harbor Statement? (Score:2)
Or, buy a PS2, XBox, or Cube for $100-$150, then get Blockbuster's unlimited game rentals for $20 a month (no 2-year commitment). After 2 years, that's $580-$630. So you've saved roughly $100 off the Phantom, you have a popular, well-supported console, a
It's the law. (Score:1)
New design...? (Score:4, Interesting)
So they missed their first proposed launch date, and have since scrapped their origional design entirely, including the box.
Personally, I think they've already got a valid (as per SCO) business model in suing people and providing On-Demand Console (via JPEGs on news sites).
Re:New design...? (Score:2)
haven't pulled up gimp or p-shop yet to check for signs, but my gut says real but tweaked.
looking at the size and style, i betcha that you could find 300dpi print res copies on infinium's site- and that would make it real easy to check.
Re:New design...? (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure it's p-shopped... (Score:4, Interesting)
looking at the mouse shot (and that's an interesting design- the upper case is one piece, and the buttons flex it when pressed) it's definitely photoshopped. somebody else can do all the gamma-type proof, but all it takes is to look at the glow around the cord.
so they might be actual devices- but they probably don't look that purty in the real world, i betcha.
regardless, we'll see in a couple of days.
Marketing, marketing, marketing! (Score:4, Insightful)
Case in point: Sega and Nintendo.
Here we had two of the largest video game manufacturers on the planet, who were literally spanked by Sony who spent gobs of cash to make their Playstations a success. PS2 hardware is inferior to that of the Gamecube and Xbox, although it has consistently outsold their competition quarter after quarter.
If Phantom hopes to be successful, they will need to spend millions to get the word out. Even 'giving' the machine away may not stem the tide of the traditional consoles with multi million dollar marketing efforts.
Lastly, I'm worried about their software distribution method. Most people don't have broadband connections, and those that do don't have a home network. If there is no built support for 802.11 wireless many will balk at the thought of having to wire their home just to play games.
Re:Marketing, marketing, marketing! (Score:3, Insightful)
The PS2 hardware is also alot older than both the gamecube and the xbox. It came out first. The reason why it continues to sell so much isn't marketing. When was the last time you saw a comerical for a PS2?
Was Linux, now XP Embedded (Score:2)
Either way, it's risky to try and get people to pay for this kind of thing. I hope they get a good list of games!
Note: I didn't see a game controller, just a keyboard and mouse.
Re:Was Linux, now XP Embedded (Score:2)
Re:Was Linux, now XP Embedded (Score:2)
http://archive.gamespy.com/devdiary/november00/i ndrema2
Re:Was Linux, now XP Embedded (Score:2)
For what it's worth, every time I heard about Infinium for a while I thought they were referring to Indrema making a comeback, so it's an easy mistake to make.
Re:Was Linux, now XP Embedded (Score:2)
It was a very heroic and pathetic venture by some nice Linux people.
Re:Was Linux, now XP Embedded (Score:2)
Sounds like a publicity stunt to hire ... (Score:2, Interesting)
I still doubt that the Phantom will ever come to light.
Re:Sounds like a publicity stunt to hire ... (Score:1)
Let's see, satellite TV, game consoles, etc... (Score:5, Insightful)
The article mentions that the company is most worried of spoofing identities. Well, they'd better be. If they want the console and service to succeed they must provide one click shopping for games an apps, with either try before you buy, or some sort of 'dissatisfied' cancel in a few hours after purchase return.
This means that once someone has another person's id/password/encrypted key or whatever, then they can purchase games in another's name while having charges applied to the other person.
I believe that within 3 months of wide availability this will be hacked so you can modify the machine without the service knowing, possibly spoofing IDs. Within a year someone will have the service connected to and running on a regular PC.
And, of course, they'll find out that it runs Linux since MS isn't going to license windows to an xbox competitor at low rates. (ie, they'll use windows, but it'll be so expensive that they'll fail financially)
-Adam
Brilliant Strategy, But Pathetically Transparent (Score:4, Insightful)
Can we get some confirmation that Huang was actually hired? Specifically from Huang himself? Infinium has a habit of lying about who they're associated with, you know. [penny-arcade.com]
Re:Brilliant Strategy, But Pathetically Transparen (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Brilliant Strategy, But Pathetically Transparen (Score:2)
To quote: "You know, somehow, 'I told you so' just doesn't cut it." ^_^
Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:5, Insightful)
Naturally, Infinium has been hyping their pursuit of the easycore (anti-hardcore) because that's supposedly where the money is, or at least according to possible investors. So, just how easycore is the Phantom in comparison to other consoles?
* Requires broadband. Hmm, well, broadband is certainly more proliferated than ever, but in regards to gaming it's still considered an element of the hardcore. I think it's safe to say that Xbox Live is doing well for an online service, but according to most publishers online gameplay is still cutting edge, and therefore hardcore. So, broadband alienates a lot of users. What's more: how many easycore people have a cat5 hookup in their living room? Is the Phantom going to support wireless? Do you see how more involved this is becoming?
* Keyboard and mouse control. I think it's fairly safe to say that the easycore far prefer a controller to a mouse and keyboard. And yet the latest renderings have no controller at all. If a user of the phantom is willing to use a mouse and keyboard to play FPS games, why not play it on their PC? Again, this is not catering to the easycore, the mouse and keyboard is definitively hardcore.
* Price. $30 a month? So, the easycore are already paying $30-50 for broadband. Probably $30-90 for cable/satellite, which I mention because it's an entertainment expense. So why would any easycore person pay $30 just to own the phantom and play freeware games? The Phantom subscription fee does not include the games, which themselves will be $40-50. Xbox Live is what, $60 for 12 months? $30 a month is a hardcore price, perhaps even more so because you really don't get anything for it. Even just paying the $200 means you get a machine that people have not coded specifically for. In other words, a game coded specifically for the Xbox, if done well, looks better than a game coded for a PC of the Phantom's specs for obvious reasons. So, why the Phantom again?
I could go on, but I have better things to do than talk about the Phantom. Feel free to add.
The linguistics used by Infinium that seem to cuddle up to the casual gamer are a farce. There's no centralized design here to that end. Gamecubes are for the casual gamer more than any other console, and there is nothing in here that is Apple or Nintendo-esque. The Phantom is just that, a constantly morphing mismatch of ideas piecemealed together from different people and different gaming idealogies, if you can even call them gaming idealogies. Practically, the Phantom is, judging by their choice of words and marketing, little more than an attempt to raise investor monies. It is not a gaming machine but a perceived cash cow for Infinium.
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:2)
I am dumbfounded by how wrong I'm proven by this new release.
I'm hesitant to state that now it couldn't possibly sound any more ridiculous
Or maybe they did.
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:2)
It would be nice if, in addition to having mods rating stories, allowing all registered users to vote for the 'best post of the story.' You would definitly get the award for this thread.
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:1)
Is it really likely that people without PCs would have broadband? and if they have a PC and broadband but do not use it for gaming would they spend the money for a router? I didn't see anything about it but does phantom support wireless network
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:1)
Do they really think that casual gamers want to throw down $30 a month for some obscure console they've never heard of? I would bet that a casual gamer is much more likely to buy something that they know other people have and that they've heard a lot about, like a Playstation 2.
If the Phantom were to be successful, I would think they would need the hardcore gamers to be their early-adopters. Without any hardcore gamers a
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:2)
Well, give them a few months. Once they read the above comments pointing out the numerous flaws in their current business plan, perhaps they'll rewrite it to target the hardcore gamers instead.
Personally, I think they'd be better off recruiting a bunch of underpants gnomes.
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:2)
Great question. I think it has to do with target audience. Infinium has exhibited far more interest in investors than they have the gaming community (c.f. HardOCP). And investors like the idea of the casual gamer more, at least now, because it's a broader market. Mainstream sounds much nicer than the nerdy fat guy who buys a game a week and has no life. That's not how it is, but that's often how it's perceived (c.f. Most
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:2)
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:2)
Total fucking bullshit. Compare UT2004 or Far Cry or Painkiller or any other recent game (fuck, even older games) -- which flies on my XP 2400 and Radeon XT -- to any goddamned Xbox game and we'll see who the winner is.
A 2500 and 5700 Ultra kick the shit out of the Xbox, even with the shitty resolution that the Xbox provides. FSAA, FSAF, 1280x1024, DX9, and not to mention raw power that o
Re:Phantom: For the Easycore? (Score:2)
Take for example, my wife. Definitely an easycore. She dabbles with Mario Kart, played Animal Crossing, and went on a Sims spurt for two months. She saw me playing the demo of Splinter Cell Pandora's Tommorow on
For the other side of the story (Score:5, Informative)
Careful what you say about the phantom (Score:2)
Still missing the most important thing (Score:2)
Sure the Xbox is faster than the PS2 but i would take a PS2 anyday since it has better games.
Sounds pretty lame. (Score:3, Interesting)
As somebody above said, this just looks like a crippled computer.
Is there anything here to be interested in? I'm certainly not excited about playing games only through a subscription service. I want a physical copy of something I own. I want to be able to play my games years after Infinium goes out of business. The only advantage to streaming games over the internet that I can think of is that it saves money on inventory and packaging, and that really isn't an advantage to the consumer unless game prices are lower. Yeah, that'll be the day... CDs were supposed to be cheaper, too. I'm certainly not excited about the games lined up, since I couldn't find any mention anywhere of exactly what titles the damn thing will play. Since Infinium has no first party development, the vast majority of games on the Phantom will already be somewhere else.
So, given those disadvantages, why would anyone want to own this thing? To have a cheap PC? The X-Box already does that better.
Good Luck (Score:3, Interesting)
At 29.95/month, whether to buy the Phantom will be rationalized as follows for most families:
Broadband internet, cell phone, digital cable/satellite TV, Tivo, other on-line games (XBox Live, misc. PC games, etc.), OnStar, telephone extras (e.g., Caller ID), brand-name groceries, new TV/computer/stereo, new furniture, new lawnmower, etc.
Okay, for this year, pick three or four.
Simply, most families cannot afford to both get new living-room furniture, for example, and get a good cell phone plan and subscribe to the Phantom service all at the same time and stay financially stable with at least some savings. Think about it: $29.95/mo. is $360/year on top of initial costs. I know I spend less than $150/year on PS2 games cause I'm about as cheap as people get; IMO, Phantom is competing with other luxuries like digital cable or broadband internet (yes, middle America, these things are luxuries).
Re:Good Luck (Score:2)
Re:Good Luck (Score:2)
Well, if it does when it hits the market, then Phantom just might get edged out of the marketplace. If a family is already spending $40 to $80 per month on broadband and they already have things like a cell phone and cable TV (another $60 to $90month), then yet another $30 per month could push them over their threshold of how much of their budget should be going towards entertainment, which also includes movies, vacations, other toys, etc.
It i
Guaranteed failure (Score:3, Informative)
It will still need early exclusive content in order to gain the required critical mass to make developers notice it enough to provide dedicated content in the future.
I can't see any reason to sign up for this over buying a PC, it's the same price and much less flexible. By the time the subscription period is up it will be out of date, and the next gen console hardware will be here, spanking it into the middle of next week.
I can't help but think that any parent with half a brain will see it for what it is, a vastly overpriced games console. At least a PC can be used for practical purposes, and is probably cheaper too.
Re:Guaranteed failure (Score:3, Insightful)
Suspicious revenue? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Suspicious revenue? (Score:1)
I am comparing it with the Nokia Ncage.... which pretty much sums up to about 100 customers across the U.S. And maybe 20 more customers internationally.
Excellent! (Score:2, Informative)
Look at those components. Look at that price. Fairly competitive at retail, especially if you can run non-xp on it. Now look 6 months down the line when the nearest suburban family bought it and the kids got bored with it. Where's the system now? $10 at their garage sale.
Do the math.
Re:Excellent! (Score:1)
Re:Excellent! (Score:1)
Imagine.. (Score:2)
download speeds? (Score:3, Insightful)
at least a couple of hours at optimal connection speeds on excellent high-bandwidth servers.
now add to the fact that a lot of gamers dislike even the loading times of games that are already installed on their machines...
I dont know about you guys, but me, I'll believe they can pull it off after they do it, when I can see it.
40 gig harddrive? Are they blind? (Score:1)
Re:40 gig harddrive? Are they blind? (Score:2)
1 gig for swap
3 gigs for specialized M$ Windows OS flab
1 gig for Phantom's own software blotation
1 gig for ad storage (why not?)
1 gig for previews, demos, game catalogs, promo crap
1 gig for user storage, save games etc.
---
32 gigs left over. 25% lost to administrativa.
That leaves space for about 16 games at 2 gigs each.
Somehow the logistics of streaming games over broadband doesn't add up. It's going to take a sizeable delay to get the core pieces of a game engine, core gr
$29.95 per month?! (Score:2, Interesting)
I consider myself to be a bit more than a casual player (but not much more) and I don't currently spend $29.95 per month on gaming. That's $359.40 per year! I spend about $30 - $40 every two months on games and I spend an average of $100 per year on hardware upgrades to keep new games running. That
Why not just sell the service? It might work! (Score:2)
Ok well I know "why", it'll just be effortlessly easy to have all the games you want I guess, instead of the stupidly easy it will probably be with the console...wait...what's easier, effortless or stupidly easy?
Er anyway, I don't quite understand how they can legally distribute all the new games they want to the subscribers? Especially a game that requi
Because they're idiots. (Score:2)
Enter the Phantom.
This is going to flop